Laserfiche WebLink
<br />become trapped oc 1501at6~ in :;>verbank Jceas reSJ iti ng ir f loo.di nJ <br />deD~hs greater than t~QSe shown on tne flood profi las. Flood; ng i::; <br />a iso i ndi cated in three "ceaS prQ~6cted by s"la! I light Iy sodded san~ <br />a1a gra.~e I Ie-vees. The Irei I levees at these locatlo1s are not <}x- <br />pect<}d to '~Ithstar.c the erosi ve lorce Of a major f lood, a~d will <br />a I".,ost cerrai n Iy fai I, I loo~i ng ar.edS beyond. <br />From the confluence with rJbnument Creek to Acadumy <br />Bouleva~d, Cottonwood is contained In the deep channel, wIth al <br />rosidential anl"S well abovOi the fl=d elevlltlor.::;. At Academy Road, <br />however, the insuHlc1ent structure C1;Ipaclty wi II causa appro~lmately <br />1,125 cubic feet per secondot Intermediate Reglon<ll i1nd 2,560 cubic <br />feet per second of the Standard Project floodflow to overtop the <br />boulevard and flow westerly down Brookwood Drive 1Ind Imperial Drlve <br />toth.. dralnaae"ay west of Price DrIve where itwlll be Intercepted <br />and rei"urned to Cottonwood Creek. In this area, many residential <br />properties wi II be flooded by both major floods. Along Academy <br />6oulevard,thewaterovertoppingtheroad>l1ly,,111 flood several coo- <br />merclal propertIes and upstrollm of the Boulevard many residential <br />propertlesonbothbanksotthastreamwlllexperlencetlooding. <br />Menyresldentlal properttes 00 the north side near Station 95-+00 will <br />be inundated froo th.. expected failure of the gravel and sand levee. <br />The failure of another lev<}e near StatJon 121+50 wIll resultlna <br />diversion of 85D cubic feet per second of the Intermediate Regional <br />Flood a~d 2,!50 CUDlc teet per second ot the Standard Project flood <br />waters down Boysenberry Drive to Brookwood Drive and down Brookwood <br />to return to the crock near Station 95+00. <br />The rernalnderof Cottollwood Creek floods agricultural <br />land, but It Is eKtnl_ly importa~t that future development of the <br />valley doeS not Include th" areas that wi II bc Inundatud. From <br />Station 115+00 to Station 221+BD the creek floods wlde areas of <br />, <br />pasture and range land, but does not endanger any Improved properties. <br />Atove Statio~ 221+80, 1""e creek is again contained I n a d.."p Iy eroded <br />channel and wi I i rr"'~..nt no haz<lrd to any res I denti a I proper1"ies. <br /> <br />The north Tributary to CoTtonwood Creek Is eroded Into <br />a deep ch::lnnel. The area Is currently rangc land and the deep nllrrow <br />valley Is unsuitable for development. FloodlngshOuldnaverbs1l <br />problem in the upper reaches of the Cottonwood and north tributary, <br />if development is not permitted in the narrow valleyS, and the stream <br />crossing structures are adequately sized. <br />The south tributary to Cottonwood Creek traverses a heav. <br />ily developed residential area along Dublin Boulevard below Academy <br />Boulevard. In this reach of the trlblJtary the stream flows in the <br />median 01 the divided Dublin Boulevard. As can be observod from the <br />flooced area maps, rnany residentlai properties will be flooded along <br />Dublin. At the Intersection of Dublin and Wlcklow Circle the trlbu- <br />tarylSSharplydlvertedfromifswesterlycoursenortherly into <br />Cottonwood Creek. This diversion Is made within a double 42 inch <br />pipe culvert u1der the west bOund lanes of Dublin. The culvert under <br />Dub I In Is not large enp~gr to accept a II the diSCharge trom either <br />major fiocd, therefore, 777 cu~lc feet pcr second of tre Intecnedlste <br />Regional Flood a~d 1,473 cu~ic 'Silt per second fro," the Standard "'ro- <br />j8Ct Flooc i, c~crlec ,,,'est ~lon9 D.w i I r oou Iilv~rd. The F lood~ater5 <br />wi II contim.e we5t.'~rd 310ng D.Jbl in Boulev"rd, 200 leet p'Jst Y\t6.1ne <br />''',ay, ,^.hort) It 'di I I .un '.'ith s~eet t'/?8 Ilow ;r ~ so~th.,rl!, direct;on <br />into a s",~11 tr;but::lry of f10nument Cnwf'.. <br />Thelnrcrnediatefleglonal Flood will bocontalned <br />In tre double 9' X 9' CJlvect undur Acade~y Boulevard, but St~ndard <br />Project FIGod wi II overtop the roadway. TIle remaInder of the south <br />tribut"cv fro", Academy Boulevard east Is currently undevelopoc, ox- <br />c;~p t for a tenn I s cl ub neM Stati 011 85+QO w.11 c~ .,,' II I ~~vc I ts cuts I de <br />tennis courts f loodec, but no ddm.age ~hou Id be incurred to the bui Id- <br />ings. <br /> <br />Velocities, RaTeS of Ri5e, and Duration <br />Table 3 Includils the flood cnaracterlstics along <br />,~tto~wooJ Cree~ a~d Its trlbu~aries. The J~tu or Table 3 ;ndi- <br /> <br />cates ~Y8r~gec ~xlmy~ concltioc~ with heights 01 r;5C. rate, of <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />" <br />