My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02234
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
FLOOD02234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:23:50 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:42:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Hydrologic Aspects of Project Planning
Date
3/7/1972
Prepared For
US
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />REGIONAL PLANNING POTENTIAL OF <br />DETERMINISTIC HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION MODELS <br /> <br />Comment, Mr. Thomas: Your allegations about no predictive model being <br />available are unfounded. I suggest that WES become familiar with <br />several computer programs that are available, in particular the <br />SSARR model of North Pacific Division. <br /> <br />Reply, Mr. Benn: The WES, in its efforts to assess the environmental <br />constraints or impacts on both military and civil activities, has <br />recognized the need for large-scale simulation of virtually all of <br />the processes in the hydrologic cycle. <br /> <br />For example, procedures for estimating soil trafficability require an <br />accurate estimate of soil moisture with depth for very specific locations. <br />I emphasize specific locations because the vast majority of the world's <br />soils does not present a trafficability problem, but there is a traffica- <br />bility problem as a whole, because of the manner in which the relatively <br />few problem soils are distributed in the landscape. Recently the WES has <br />studied many of the existing hydrologic simulation models, including the <br />Kentucky, Stanford, USDA, USGS, Texas, Kansas, and the HEC hydrograph <br />package. All these models are optimized to reproduce storm hydrographs, <br />and a significant attribute of the models is the fact that they all use <br />"lumped" or watershed average values to estimate transpiration, intercep- <br />tion, water storage changes, infiltration, etc. Further, the specific <br />values for input functions are determined by forcing the predicted hydro- <br />graph to fit the measured hydrograph. This result is a calibration or <br />solution for a specific watershed with little assurance that the input <br />functions are related to the real world, or indeed even to each other, in <br />a unique way. I feel that practical improvements in the existing models <br />can be made by developing methods for simulating the various hydrologic <br />process as a function of specific measurable terrain parameters. This <br />would result in more suitable models for solving a wider range of Corps <br />of Engineers' problems in worldwide terrain conditions. <br /> <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.