Laserfiche WebLink
<br />if the frequencies with which tactical gaps* of specific kinds will be en- <br />countered are known. Since there was adequate evidence to demonstrate that <br />different geographic regions exhibit different numbers and kinds of tactical <br />gaps ,it was essential that a consistent and objective procedure be developed <br />which, when used, would define the tactical gap characteristics of any geo- <br />graphic region to which it was applied. <br /> <br />7. In view of these considerations, two of the major objectives were: <br /> <br />a. To develop a widely applicable procedure for the acquisition <br />of reliable data on the characteristics of a militarily sig- <br />nificant tactical gap (hereafter called "gap"). The proce- <br />dures which were to be developed were to be as general as <br />possible so that only a minimum of modification would be <br />required to make them applicable to any region of the world. <br /> <br />b. To develop a procedure for presenting the acquired gap data <br />in a form in which they could be readily used in operation <br />research models dealing with the prediction of performance of <br />various tactical gap crossing systems (bridging, rafting, <br />fording, swimming) and their related engineering activities <br />(grading, mat laying, surfacing). <br /> <br />8. At the time of initiation of the project, there were no performance <br />prediction models for the various gap-crossing systems. Lacking the identi- <br />fication of significant terrain factors that would have been provided by the <br />models, it was thus necessary to study the various gap-crossing systems in <br />considerable detail. From this examination, all terrain attributes that <br />could be hypothesized to affect tactical gap-crossing materiel and activi- <br />ties were derived. Table 1 is a matrix illustrating the relations among <br />terrain factors and gap-crossing systems. <br /> <br />9. Even before data collection can begin, there are always two nagging <br />sets of problems that must be resolved. First, since the significant factors <br />are distributed in both time and space, the method of presenting the data for <br />use or analysis must be established. In most instances, this is some form <br />of map. The fact that maps are to be used raises the second question, namely, <br />classification. Because classification is an unavoidable concomitant of any <br />mapping process, consideration of the nature of an ideal classification system <br />is relevant and, indeed, essential. There is one overwhelming requirement. <br />The class intervals should be such that any point selected between class limits <br />would introduce only an acceptably small error in prediction. That is, if all <br />other factor values are held constant, the difference in prediction that would <br />result from accepting a point taken near the lower end of the class range and <br /> <br />-.:......'-,-,-...--..~-.-------.....-.-....--- <br /> <br />*A tactical gap is a linear terrain feature (such as a ditch, canal, or river) <br />which tends to impede the cross-country movement of personnel or vehicles. <br /> <br />15 <br />