|
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />The storm sewers were generally placed with a minimum cover of 2-feet to
<br />
<br />minimize the traffic loading impacts on the pipe, Storm sewer sizes and
<br />
<br />
<br />locations were also determined, in part, to minimally impact existing utili-
<br />
<br />
<br />ties and to utilize existing storm sewer facilities where practical,
<br />
<br />), DENVER HIGHLINE CANAL SPILL STRUCTURE
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Capacity of inlets were determined from the Criteria Manual. Storm sewer
<br />
<br />
<br />inlets were sized based upon the Colorado Department of Highways type-R curb
<br />
<br />
<br />opening inlets with 6-inch throat and 5-, 10-, and 15-foot lengths, The capa-
<br />
<br />
<br />city of the inlet depended upon whether the inlet was in a sump or on-grade
<br />
<br />
<br />condition, For inlets on-grade, the design capacity was also based upon the
<br />
<br />
<br />estimated street grade, Typical values of design capacity used for preliminary
<br />
<br />
<br />design are listed in the following table:
<br />
<br />The criteria for the design of this structure was based upon the Denver
<br />
<br />Highline Canal Master Plan (Reference-8), The spillway was designed to dis-
<br />
<br />
<br />charge 550 cis under 100-year flood conditions, The crest elevation has been set
<br />
<br />
<br />I,I-feet above the water surface at the base flow discharge of 200 cfs, The
<br />
<br />
<br />crest should be concrete and have cut-off walls for erosion protection, Addi-
<br />
<br />tionally, the crest should be designed so as not to restrict access along the
<br />
<br />
<br />canal road. Adequate protection upstream and downstream of the crest should
<br />
<br />
<br />also be provided.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />4 , OPEN CHANNEL
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br /> INLET SIZE CONDITION CAPACITY
<br /> 5 L.F, Sump 4.0
<br /> 10 L,F, Sump 8,0
<br /> 15 L,F, Sump 12,0
<br /> 5 L.F. On-Grade ),0
<br /> 10 L.F, On-Grade 5.5
<br /> 15 L,F. On-Grade 7.0
<br />2, CALEY DETENTION FACILITY
<br />
<br />Design of the channel in Reach-B was based upon conveying the upstream
<br />
<br />storm sewer flow to the downstream storm sewer reach. Using a Manning "n" of
<br />
<br />
<br />.028, the 100-year channel velocities were limited to 7.0-feet per second.
<br />
<br />
<br />The concrete channel bottom should be a minimum of 5.0-feet wide and the grass-
<br />
<br />
<br />lined channel side slopes should be 4: 1 maximum,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />C. Construction Sequence
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Caley detention was sized with a maximum embankment height less than 15-
<br />
<br />
<br />feet and with the maximum depth at the emergency spillway less than 10-feet.
<br />
<br />
<br />The final construction plans will therefore not require approval of the State
<br />
<br />Engineer's Office (SED), However, due to the proximity to downstream residences,
<br />
<br />
<br />the facility should be designed to meet SED criteria, The facility was planned
<br />
<br />
<br />to take advantage of topographical conditions, land use, and multi-purpose
<br />
<br />
<br />useage, The spillway width of 100-feet was sized for a storm intensity approx-
<br />
<br />
<br />imately half way between a 100-year and PMP event, The design discharge is
<br />
<br />2600 cfs compared to a peak 100-year inflow of 1010 cfs. The 4:1 embankment
<br />
<br />
<br />slopes will improve the visual imapct and add to stability. The final design
<br />
<br />
<br />should be coordinated with the South Suburban Metro Recreation and Park District
<br />
<br />
<br />to assure the maximum recreational and flood protection benefits.
<br />
<br />Improvements for Reaches-A, -B, and -C are somewhat dependent on the proposed
<br />
<br />
<br />detention facility in Reach-D, Priority of construction can be related to the
<br />
<br />damage frequency, net benefits, or other criteria established by the municipality,
<br />
<br />
<br />Based upon these criteria and the fact that 80% of the total average annual damages
<br />
<br />
<br />occur in Reach-A, the immediate priority should be construction of the proposed
<br />
<br />storm sewer system in Reach-A, Without Caley detention. the proposed system would
<br />
<br />be capable of handling a flood with a frequency of about 2-year, With construction
<br />
<br />
<br />of the detention facility above Caley Avenue, the second priority, the capacity of
<br />
<br />
<br />the storm sewer in a Reach-A will be increased to a 5-year frequency level, Con-
<br />
<br />struction of Caley detention facility would also eliminate most of the flood damages
<br />
<br />
<br />in Reach-C by intercepting all flooding from the drainage basin above, The outlet
<br />
<br />
<br />pipe, beneath the dam would be constructed to discharge at street level, After the
<br />
<br />
<br />storm sewer system 1S constructed along South Pennsylvania Avenue, the outlet works
<br />
<br />
<br />can be modified to discharge directly into the storm sewer, thereby eliminating
<br />
<br />
<br />discharges in the street.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />-))-
<br />
<br />-)4-
<br />
|