Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />III. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />SJCD (South) - Basin 6200 <br /> <br />At the Nevada Ditch, SJCD (South) - Basin 6200 drains approximately 4.02 square <br /> <br /> <br />miles. There are three branches including the North Tributary and Tributaries <br /> <br />1 and 2. The North Tributary will become tributary to SJCD (South) - Basin 6200 <br /> <br /> <br />when drainage improvements are constructed in accordance with the North Tribu- <br /> <br /> <br />tary's Master Plan (July 1976). This future conditian was included in this <br /> <br /> <br />analysis. Below the Nevada Ditch, gravel is being mined and no definable drain- <br /> <br /> <br />age outlet to the South Platte River exists. The lower portion of the basin <br /> <br /> <br />is in Arapahoe County, while the major portian is in Jefferson County. The up- <br /> <br /> <br />stream limit of study extends to an elevation of 5770 feet. Main channel slopes <br /> <br /> <br />throughout the reach average 1.5%. SJCD (South) Tributary No. 1 joins the main <br /> <br /> <br />branch at a point below South Wadsworth Boulevard. It drains an area of 0.70 <br /> <br /> <br />square miles, passes through the existing Fairview Heights subdivision and has <br /> <br />an average channel slope of 2.2%. Tributary No.2 joins SJCD (South) at a point <br /> <br /> <br />near Ken Caryl Road. It drains an area of 0.22 square miles with an average <br /> <br /> <br />channel slope of 1.9%. <br /> <br />The drainageways were divided into 13 separate sub-basins which are shown on <br /> <br /> <br />Plate I. Flood hydrographs were developed for each sub-basin for the 2, 5, 10, <br /> <br /> <br />50, and 100 year floods for the future basin development condition. Hydrologic <br /> <br /> <br />parameters including tributary area, basin length, length to centroid, and <br /> <br />basin slope were measured from U. S. G. S. quadrangle maps, and detailed topo- <br /> <br /> <br />graphic mapping provided by the UDFCD. Estimates of existing and projected <br /> <br /> <br />impervious areas were made fram analysis of aerial photographs, inspection of <br /> <br /> <br />other developed areas in the Denver Metropolitan area, and through data rela- <br /> <br /> <br />ting density of development to impervious area for Denver and other areas of <br /> <br /> <br />the country. All hydrologic information concerning the North Tributary of <br /> <br />SJCD (South) - Basin 6200 was taken from a major drainageway planning study <br /> <br /> <br />prepared by CH2M-Hill, Inc. for the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, <br /> <br /> <br />Jefferson County and Arapahoe County in July 1976. <br /> <br />For all sub-basins east of the Hogback Ridge, the Colorado Urban Hydrograph <br /> <br />Procedure (CUHP) was utilized. The procedure is described in the Urban Storm <br /> <br />Drainage Criteria Manual published in 1969. The UDFCD issued an interim pro- <br /> <br /> <br />cedure for determining the unit hydrograph coefficients c and c as functions <br />t p <br /> <br />of basin slope and impervious area. It is described in their June, 1977 issue <br /> <br />of "Flood Hazard News", and was used to define the unit hydrograph coefficients <br /> <br /> <br />in this study. For the upper basin of Massey Draw (Sub-basin F), another syn- <br /> <br /> <br />thetic hydrograph procedure called SYNHYD was utilized. It was developed <br /> <br /> <br />specifically by LRCWE for application to non-urban basins. It is based on <br /> <br /> <br />Snyder's synthetic hydrograph method and differs from the CUHP in the compu- <br /> <br /> <br />tation of the time to peak, inclusion of basin slope as a variable, definition <br /> <br /> <br />of c and c coefficients, and the shape of the unit hydrograph. A descrip- <br />t p <br /> <br />tion of the program is included in the hydrologic backup data for this study <br /> <br /> <br />which is an file with the UDFCD. <br /> <br />Basin Development <br /> <br />Existing development was determined thraugh analysis of aerial photographs and <br /> <br /> <br />base maps provided by Jefferson County, and by field inspection. Future develop- <br /> <br />ment was projected with the aid of a map titled, "Southeast Jefferson Caunty <br /> <br /> <br />Development" provided by the Jeffersan County Planning Department, and through <br /> <br />discussions with Jefferson County Planning and Engineering personnel. In addition, <br /> <br /> <br />a number of development plats were obtained and reviewed. <br /> <br />Design rainfall was taken from the publication, "Rainfall/Runoff Information, <br /> <br /> <br />Magnitude/Frequency, Design Rainfall, Small Urban Basins". It is summarized in <br /> <br />Tables 111-2 through 111-4. For all sub-basins east of the Hogback Ridge infil- <br /> <br /> <br />tration losses recommended by the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual were <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Leonard Rice Consuiting Water Engineers, Inc. <br />