Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />l5 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5. The master plan, when implemented, will result in flows up <br /> <br />7. Several notable exceptions to the ten-year facilities are <br /> <br />to the ten-year flood passing through the entire lengths <br /> <br />recommended. Larger facilities are advised to reduce <br /> <br />of the channels without creating damage. A one-hundred <br /> <br />flooding on Colfax Avenue, Wadsworth Boulevard and Kipling <br /> <br />year flood plain (for flows exceeding the capacities of the <br /> <br />Street in order to reduce the level of flooding in a one <br /> <br />facilities) would be defined and regulated. It would thus <br /> <br />hundred-year storm sufficiently to allow passage of <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />become gradually cleared and the damage potential would be <br /> <br />emergency vehicles on those arterial streets. <br /> <br />gradually reduced. <br /> <br />After evaluation of the Phase A report, the Urban Drainage <br /> <br />6. It is recommended that the cities adopt a number of "select <br /> <br />District and the Cities of Denver and Lakewood selected the plan <br /> <br />structural improvements" in Reaches where open channels <br /> <br />which should be used for the Major Drainageway Planning on Dry <br /> <br />presently exist. These would include acquisition of right- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Gulch. In a statement dated May 30, 1978, the Clients estab- <br /> <br />of-way of land traversed by the main channels, ,shaping of the <br /> <br />lished the general guidelines for the master plan; this state- <br /> <br />natural channel into a more stable configuration, where such <br /> <br />ment is reproduced below: <br /> <br />shaping is merited, construction of erosion control facili- <br /> <br />ties, and development of access routes to allow maintenance <br /> <br />vehicles to reach the channels. Note that these improve- <br /> <br />DRY GULCH <br />SELECTED PHASE B PLAN <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />ments would provide only minor tangible benefits in return <br /> <br />General <br /> <br />l. Recommend enforcement of flood plain regulations of the <br />lOO-year flood plain. <br /> <br />for their costs. As such, they can be assigned a lower <br /> <br />priority than the other items of the Recommended Alternative. <br /> <br />2. Discuss in the plan the need for regulating the residual <br />lOO-year flood plain for drainageway improvements <br />designed to convey less than lOO-year. <br /> <br />The actual steps of this measure could wait until owners of <br /> <br />land containing the gulch propose development. At that time, <br /> <br />3. Any storm sewer inlets to be provided in conjunction <br />with the recommended and/or selected improvements should <br />be "Type R" as designated by the Colorado Department of <br />Highways and should be designed using the Standard Curb- <br />Opening Inlet Chart in the June, 1977 issue of "Flood <br />Hazard News". <br /> <br />they would be encouraged to develop the channel in con for- <br /> <br />mance with the master plan, and to dedicate to the City <br /> <br />right-of-way containing the channel. However, within this <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />report the total costs are shown; no attempt is made to <br /> <br />4. The plan should encourage purchase of flood insurance. <br /> <br />divide the costs into public and private funding sources. <br />