FLOOD02168 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

of chapter 3. The tax revenues and revenues to the water userS in Montrose and Delta counties are contained in chapter 3 of the EIS. 30. MR. JANES CLARK: Boating use of the Gunnison River is in its infancy; it has the potential to become a huge business. Low flows impact this use; low flows require increased work at the Relief Diversion Dam and this is dangerous to boaters. I am in strong disagreement with the DEIS conclusions that there will be no adverse impacts on the trout fishery. A full river channel of 500-600 ft'/s is best when considering the entire life cycle of trout. This is because a full channel increases the population of aquatic plants as well as aquatic insects. Also, a full channel provides more habitat for the trout. The optimum flow of 500-600 ft'/s would grow larger and more trout because the increased area and increased biomass would allow favorable growth, reproduction, and health of this world class fishery. Studies show that the river between the North Fork and Austin to be growing larger trout than the Gunnison Gorge. I feel that the confluence to Austin stretch represents a fabulous resource for our area. This reach with low flows in the 300 to 400 ft'/s range last summer had water temperatures up to 72 to 75 degrees during many of the days, and this had a negative effect on the trout. The emergence of aquatic insects was reduced. Fishing that is normally excellent was very slow. Trout do not do well when the water temperature is in the seventies--oxygen is reduced and the metabolism, growth, and health of the cold water species are all negatively affected by these high temperatures. I also heard reports of fish with parasites or leeches; it could be the resistance was down on some fish. Studies dealing with the warm water in the lower Gunnison River and the effect on the aquatic life needs to be entered in the EIS. The hydropower proposal would threaten the proposed Wild and Scenic River designation. There is no need for the project other than to help the water users with debt retirement. Mitigation measures, as proposed in the DEIS, fall way short of alleviating the harm and loss of priceless aesthetics and riparian habitat. The long-term economic losses to our communities, as priceless resources and recreation, are compromised and would in my opinion exceed the revenue gained from power generation that appears unneeded. RESPONSE: Boating on the Gunnison River has the potential to increase in the future. The popularity of floating the river has increased during high flow years; however, the low flow years that invariably follow may slow this popularity. In spite of the assumed decreased popularity, the demand for floating the river P-23