My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02106
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD02106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:57:57 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:37:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Title
Stream Stability and Scour at Highway Bridges Participant Workbook
Date
10/1/1999
Prepared For
Students
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />LESSON 4 <br /> <br />STREAM STABILITY - LEVEL 1 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES <br /> <br />I. GENERAL SOLUTION! PROCEDURE <br /> <br />A. A stable channel does not change in size, shape, form, or position with <br />time; however, all alluvial channels change to some extent and are <br />somewhat unstable, The next three lessons consider a systematic <br />approach to evaluation of stream stability at highway crossings and provide <br />a stepwise procedure to facilitate such analyses by highway engineers. <br /> <br />B. The basic solution approach involves three levels of analysis of increasing <br />complexity: <br /> <br />level 1: <br /> <br />Application of simple geomorphic concepts and other <br />qualitative analysis techniques, <br /> <br />level 2: <br /> <br />Application of basic hydrologic, hydraulic, and sediment <br />transport engineering concepts. <br /> <br />level 3: <br /> <br />Application of mathematical or physical modeling studies. <br /> <br />C, The completion of each level of analysis results in an assessment of <br />stream stability and leads to a conclusion regarding the nE~ed for more <br />detailed analysis, or a decision to proceed directly to design/scour <br />evaluation of the bridge or selection and design of countermeasures based <br />on the results of the current level of analysis, <br /> <br />4.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.