My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02106
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD02106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:57:57 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:37:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Title
Stream Stability and Scour at Highway Bridges Participant Workbook
Date
10/1/1999
Prepared For
Students
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4. Specifically, a coefficient of dis,charge, is utiilized in evaluation of the <br />bridge profile. This coefficient i:s a function of bridge ge10rnetry and <br />flow characteristics, <br /> <br />5. The model alse) estimates an erffective flow length upstream of the <br />bridge which provides better estimates of friction losses through the <br />bridge reach, <br /> <br />6. Comparison of WSPRO with other computer models, including <br />HEC-2, has fClund that overall, WSPRO appears to give better <br />results and tends to more completely define the profile through the <br />bridge. <br /> <br />C. COE HEC-2 Water SlLIrface Profile Computer Model. <br /> <br />1. HEC-2 is a generalized computer model for calculating water <br />surface profiles in natural and man made channels. The effects of <br />various obstrUl:tions, including bridges, may be considered in the <br />computations, <br /> <br />2. Energy losses caused by brid~les are calculated in two parts: the <br />contraction and expansion losses for the cross sections upstream <br />and downstream of the structure, and the loss through the structure <br />itself by either the normal or special bridgE~ methods, <br /> <br />3. The normal bridge method handles the bridge section as any other <br />river cross section, except that the area of the bridge below the <br />water surface is subtracted from the total area and the wetted <br />perimeter is increased when flow exceeds the low chord. <br /> <br />4, The special bridge method calculates the losses thrQugh the <br />structure for low flow with piers and for weir flow and pre~ssure flow, <br />based on various equations. <br /> <br />5. The bridge analysis methods in HEC-2 are! limited in that they only <br />account for piE~r configuration and not other differences in bridge <br />geometry, Additionally, the equations and coefficients utilized do <br />not reflect more recent research in bridge hydraulics, <br /> <br />6. The COE has recently released HEC River Analysis System (RAS), <br />their next generation water surface profile model. The current <br />version of HEC-RAS only supports steady 110w water surface profile <br />calculations. New features and additional capabilities will be added <br />in future releases. <br /> <br />3.29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.