Laserfiche WebLink
<br />06 <br /> <br />FLOODS OF 1965 IN THE UNITED STATES <br /> <br />1000 <br /> <br />Q <br />Z <br />Q <br />U <br />~ <br />o <br />= <br />~ <br />~ <br />>- <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />U <br />.. <br />" <br />U <br />~ <br />Q <br />gj <br />Z <br />'" <br />o <br />" <br />Q <br />: <br />>- <br />:!: 10 <br />~. <br />"' <br />= <br />'" <br />: <br />u <br />o <br />Q <br />" <br />'" <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />100 i <br /> ~ <br /> .; <br /> z <br /> <br /> <br /> . <br /> ~ <br /> . <br />= .. <br />~ u <br />:! ]- <br /> . <br /> ~ <br /> ~ <br /> <br />~ . <br />o' <br />~~ <br />. ' <br />2z <br />~ <br />Limit of 1890 data (from Cl'tllger, <br />Justin, and Hinds, 19451. <br /> <br />. E a <br />.. ~ '&8 <br />...c.:o CIl"",,' <br />~~ s" :; e <br />.....~!i =IU <br />5~ ~ <br />...",'E <br />" .- <br />';1 w. <br />~ <br /> <br />)( Data from Hoyt end <br />Langbein 11955.p, BOI <br />. June 1965 floods in <br />Arkanw River basin <br /> <br />. <br />Ii~ <br />"",' ':;:l!i <br />~~Ig' <br />. ~ c- g~ ~ i <br />...= i:E g 'lii . u <br />i!::r: =2 < =--...... <br />~~ ~ i i: <br />'il! l!i:'i~ <br />~~ c3'E~z <br />~. . <br />. <br /> <br />z <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />10 100 1000 <br />DRAINAGE AREA, IN SQUARE MILES <br /> <br />10,000 <br /> <br />FIGURE 1. - Maximum discharges in relation to drainage area. <br /> <br />COMPARISON BY FREQUENCY RELATIONS <br /> <br />Regional flood-frequency relations cannot be used directly to compare <br />the relative magnitude of extremely outstanding floods (those with <br />recurrence intervals greater than 50 yr) in the Arkansas River basin because <br />the relations have been defined only up to the 50,year recurrence interval <br />(Patterson, 1964). Also, the relations have not been defined for small <br />drainage basins because of insufficient peak-flow data. The continuing <br />collection of peak,flow data will eventually provide information to extend <br />the relations to greater recurrence intervals and to define the relations for <br />small drainage basins. <br />Regardless of the inadequacies in the present flood-frequency relations, <br />they must be used in some manner by planners in protective design. One <br />such manner is by comparison with the 50-year flood from the frequency <br />relations. The 1965 floods in the Arkansas River basin equalled or exceeded <br />the 50-year flood at many sites; at some, by many times. For example, the <br />peak discharges of Clay Creek near Lamar, Colo., Jimmy Camp Creek <br />near Fountain, Colo., and Chase Canyon near Cimarron, N. Mex., were 30, <br />30, and 20 times those of the 50-year floods, respectively. Of the 131 sites <br />where peak discharges were determined, at least 47 had discharges equal to, <br />or greater than, that of the 50,year flood. At 40 sites on small drainage <br />h~"in~ the f1nnn_frf":1lI1f":n~V rf':l~tinn~ ~rp. nnt nf'.finp.n, hut the 10(\'\ flnmi <br /> <br />j <br />