My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02053
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD02053
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:11:48 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:33:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Weld
Boulder
Community
Weld, Boulder Counties
Stream Name
Big Thompson River
Title
Meteorological Aspects of the Big Thompson Flash Flood of 31 July 1976
Date
7/1/1977
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
NOAA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />like that sampled hy the 1920 GMT Ster- <br />ling sonde. Strong easterly flow hehind the <br />trailing front carried this moist, condition- <br />ally unstahle hut strongly capped air mass <br />into the foothills of the Front R,mge. Oro- <br />graphic lifting triggered a large convective <br />storm complex, which hecame oriented <br />north to south along the foothills, and <br />which fed on the very moist air mass he- <br />neath the frontal inversion. \Veak south- <br />southeasterly winds ahove the inversion <br /> <br />3. Conditions During the <br />Storm Period <br /> <br />Meteorological conditions associated <br />with the evolution of the Big Thompson <br />storm complex were studied along the <br />Front Range from Denver to the area just <br />north and west of Ft. Collins. Data were <br />availahle from the following sites: Ft. Col- <br />lins (Colorado State University, Atmos- <br />pheric Science Building), Greeley (Uni- <br />versity of Northern Colorado, Ross Hall), <br />Table Mountain (NOAA-ERL), Boulder <br />(NOAA-ERL), Jefferson County Ail])ort <br />(FAA), Rocky Flats (ERDA), Denver <br />(Stapleton International Airport, )JOAA- <br />NWS), and Arapahoe County Airport <br />(FAA). Radar rellectivitv data were avail- <br />ahle for the entire ston~ period from the <br />NWS WSR-57 radar at Limon, Colorado, <br />(located approximately 205 km southeast of <br />the Big Thompson area). Reflectivity data <br />were also availahle from the NHRE 10 cm <br />radar (located at Grover, Colorado, approx- <br />imately lIS km east-northeast of the Big <br />Thompson "rea) for a 45 min period near <br />the heginningofthe storm. Thunderstorms <br />that produced flooding on the North Fork <br />of the Cache la Pondre River were gener- <br />ally heyond the area of radar coverage, <br /> <br />3.1 Local Area Analyses <br /> <br />At three sites (Stapleton International <br />Airport, Tahle Mountain, and Rocky Flats) <br /> <br />allowed the storm complex to remain <br />nearlv stationarv over the foothills. Fur- <br />then';ore, indi~idual cells continued to <br />form on the southeast flank of the storm and <br />moved north-northwestward into the com- <br />plex hefore dissipating. Thus a nearly <br />stationary rainstorm developed over the <br />Big Thompson drainage. <br /> <br />surface data were recorded on an almost <br />continuous hasis. At Tahle Mountain <br />(ahout 6 mi north of Boulder) the east-west <br />component of the wind was measured, <br />from the sUlface to 600 m, with '1 Doppler <br />acoustic echo sounder operated hy the <br />'Nave Propagation Lahoratorv of )JOAA- <br />ERL. Detailed time series' were con- <br />structed using these data and are presented <br />in Figs. 28-30. These time series hourlv <br />observations from the remaining si~es, an;! <br />Limon radar data were utilized to construct <br />the local-scale surElCe ,malvses shown in <br />Fig. 31. These analyses are ,{t \12 h intervals <br />for the time period 2,330-0100 GMT. Radar <br />echo contours for VIP (Video Integrator <br />Processor) levels 1, 2, and 3 are depicted. <br />These contours correspond to the <br />minimum detectahle signal, 30 dBZ and 41 <br />dBZ respectively. <br />In the Ft. Collins, Loveland, and <br />Greeley areas an increase in wind speeds <br />and gustiness were the onlv indications of <br />the passage of the trailing fr~nt. These areas <br />had remained partly cloudy with upslope <br />southeasterly flow during the afternoon, <br />resulting in little temperature difference <br />across the front. In the Denver-Boulder <br />area, however, afternoon cloudiness was <br />minimal. The resulting heating and mixing <br />had elevated surface temperatures and <br />lowered de"1Joints, \Vinds were also more <br /> <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.