Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />!lo~t; <br />o~..:! <br />'t.it: "'- <br />". <br />~ 1:~- <br />S.ll~! , <br />-:;;'.!1:h ~ <br />~.;:;:- . <br />"," .... <br />. .. <br />....:t.. <br />",." :a <br />-~-:;. <br />.!1:;:~';;:l; , <br />.::l ~-. <br />< . " <br />~iH~ " <br />... <br />...."'., '" <br />-=..;~,,~ ~ <br />.-- <br />-===1l"l! <br />.. " 8 <br />"Q"~= <br />ol':! ~'i " <br />. It'" ~ < <br />!j!:"..'!.Il1 ~ <br />" . " <br />li:J~l ~ <br />=!~i] N <br />~ <br />h~=-'5 " <br />" <br />.."'1!"'- 0 <br />Hi!~H " <br />",.. ..-g <br />".:!~=" <br />u ".- <br />- ~_..... <br />.10....:;:.. <br />.. "'-~-ll~:; <br />0.,,0-,,0 <br />>:~ll..t~ <br /> <br />, ~~Hi~ <br />,2_ . <br />: ~~.. z" <br />iii!fll ~ <br />; ~. .M . <br />. p~!' . <br />; !~i ..: <br />;~r.l~ <br />~ ~ . t"O': . <br />~ ~~: Ii , <br />N <br />J,-'H' > <br />..,! I " <br />" <br />"'j' " <br />EU,; . <br />~ 1 .~ ij <br />;~Jlj iJ <br />0 <br />. . w <br />,!'Ji! " <br />" <br />1'1.., ~ <br />:!li' . <br />~ <br />_tj ~s w <br />"'jl " <br />;'11" " <br />0 <br />~) "S " <br />jilli! <br />..1I.l <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DETERMINATIONS <br /> <br />Flood Characteristics <br /> <br />Floods in the study area are usually caused by general rainstorms and <br />cloudburst storms during the period May through September. Floods re- <br />sulting frorn prolonged heavy rainfall over the watershed are characterized <br />by moderate peak floVl of moderate volume and duration, The cloudburst type <br />is a high-intensity, short duration rainstorm which produces a flood of <br />high pNk flOVl, short duration and small volume of runoff. <br />Flood potenthl also exists from rapid melting of heavy snow cover in late <br />spring and sumner. Flood flows resulting from sno\<tllelt are characterized <br />by moderate peaks, 1arge volume and long duration. Arkansas River peak flow <br />from snD\<I11elt occurs in June and July. This p~ak flow in combination with <br />rainfall can cause severe flooding. <br /> <br />Hydrologic AnalYSis <br />Hydrologic analyses >lE're carried <br />frequency relationShips for floods <br />the Arkansas River and to compare <br />Engineers report (Reference 11, <br />herein. <br /> <br />out to establish the peak dischargeM <br />of the selected recurrence intervals for <br />resu1tsbetween the U,S, Army Corps of <br />for the flooding sour<:es under study <br /> <br />A regional relationship of basin area to peak discharge was used for the <br />Arkansas River. Gaging stations locat('d within the ~pper Arkansas basin <br />wer(,lIS('dtoestablishthisregional relationship. Thefrlethod developed by <br />the U.S. l<Iater Resources Cou~cil (Reference 6) was used to detenl'line the <br />floodflow~frequency rel ationship based on a Log-Pearson Type I II di strj. <br />bution for eaCh sel ected gaging station. The ann~al peak di scharges were <br />obtained from U.S. Geological Survey l<Iater-SupplyPaper Nos. 1681, 1921, <br />and 2121 (References 2,3, and 4, respectivelyl and from l<Iater Reso~r<:es <br />Gata tor Colorado (Reference5l. Regional relationships of basin area to <br />peak discharge were determined for the 10-, 50-, 100-, and50D-yearfloods. <br />These discharges >lE're then compared to the discharges obtained by the Corp <br />of Engineers' 1n their study at Florence, Colorado (Reference I). The <br />Corps of Engineers computed frequency-discharge curves from gage station <br />analyses of the USGS gages on the Arkansas River at P~eblo and Cano~ City. <br />An area proportion was then appl ied betwee~ the Pueblo and Canon City <br />station results to obtain the peak floVls in the town of Florence and in <br />FremontCOllnty. The diSCharges obtained in CDM'sregional analysis fell <br />within the 90% confidence limits of the Corps of Engineers' Canon City gage <br />station analysis discharges in Reference 1 and therefore the hydrologic <br />anlaysisas presented by the Corps of Engineers in the FlorenceFl oodplain <br />Information Report was adopted for use in estimating the flood boundaries <br />for the Arkansas River. <br /> <br />The peak diSCharges for the Arkansds River at Canon City and Florence are <br />presented tn Tahle 3 and Figure 4. <br /> <br />19 <br />