My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02020
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD02020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:57:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:32:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Title
Feasibility Evaluation Multijurisdictional Urban Drainage Projects
Date
2/1/1977
Prepared For
UDFCD
Prepared By
Multiple Authors
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />32 <br /> <br />IV, TRADEOFF ANALYSIS AND DECISION MAKING <br />From the earlier steps, the basic evaluation information is <br />available, A number of additional considerations are bound to appear, <br />however, and the decision makers should consider these carefully, <br />Some of the items to consider are: <br />1, Budget constraints <br />2, Environmental constraints <br />3, Public acceptability <br />4, Changing priorities <br />5, Development goals <br />6, Growth management <br />In the actual Little Dry Creek reoort, a six-dams plan was <br />recommended and accepted in early stages of discussion, It must be <br />implemented over time, however, and individual elements will orobably <br />change before the plan is completed, This is part of the natural <br />process of implementation, with feedback, <br />The reader will probably wonder why this section is so brief, <br />It is simply not possible to explain how to apply the judgment, dis- <br />cretion and attention to priorities that must be used in the tradeoff <br />analysis, In fact, some writers say this is part of the political <br />process, not the economic analysis, The best approach seems tc be one <br />where the analysis results in complete information for the decision <br />makers, Then, by participating in the ti^adeoff sessions, the analyst <br />can further elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of the alter- <br />native approaches, Only after a thorough process of give-and-take will <br />all parties feel that the correct decisions have been reached, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.