My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD02020
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD02020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:57:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:32:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Title
Feasibility Evaluation Multijurisdictional Urban Drainage Projects
Date
2/1/1977
Prepared For
UDFCD
Prepared By
Multiple Authors
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8 <br /> <br />tributaries of the main stream, probably 1000 acres or more in size, <br />The reaches should be selected according to change in land use or <br />jurisdiction, For example, a shopping center in the city and an <br />adjacent residential area in the county should not be included in <br />the same reach, The number of decision units should be kept as small <br />as possible without losing valuable decision information, <br />2, Development of Damage-Frequency Information. If the damage- <br />frequency information is gathered at this point, it can greatly aid <br />the formulation and screening of alternatives later. The basic <br />problem is to determine for each decision unit the variation in <br />potential flood damage with frequency of flooding under existing <br />floodplain conditions, If expected future tributary basin hydrology <br />is considerably different from eXisting conditions, it should be <br />used, It is a policy decision whether existing or future f1ood- <br />frequency relationships will be used, <br />The hydrological and hydraulic analyses will yield stage- <br />frequency curves for each channel reach or decision unit, These must <br />be converted to damage-frequency curves through use of depth-damage <br />curves as explained in detail in Appendix A, The information needed <br />is summarized on Figure 11-1, <br />3, Formulation of Alternatives. Experienced UDFC engineers <br />should formulate the most promising alternatives for each Decision <br />Unit. They should include structural and nonstructura1 strategies <br />in their array of alternatives to be considered, Normally, combina- <br />tions of the following basic conceptual approaches should be considered: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.