Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.,,, <br />.. <br />Ii <br />II: <br />!c <br />~. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />{ <br />'- <br /> <br />7-12. THO ditches that convey storm runoff for the city of Las Animas <br />empty dir'ectly into an abandoned gravel pit located just southeast of the U.S. <br />High"lay 50 bridge. The gravel pit has a surface area of approximately 6 acres <br />"ith a depth ranging froffi 0 to 12 feet. The capacity of the gravel pit is <br />approximately 36 acre-feet. FloH into the gravel pit comes from the north- <br />east section of Las Animas (urban area, infiltration rate, 0.50 inch pe~ hour) <br />and from fields and pastures (infiltration rate, 0.70 inch per hour) east of <br />U.S. Eig]way 50. The volume of runoff "as determined by using the I-hour, <br />25-year recurrence interval storm (2.3 inches) from U. S. Heather Bureau <br />Technical Paper ~lo. 40. . The urban area (63 acres) produced 9.4 acre-feet of <br />runoff; "hile the fields and pastures (54 acres) produced 7.2 acre-feet of <br />runoff for a total of 16.6 acre-feet.. The gravel pit has sufficient capacity <br />to contain a I:1uch larger flood or a sequence of floods. <br /> <br />7-13. The Hydrology memorandum made use of U. S. Heather Bureau Technical <br />Paper No. 25 to determinr rainfall. Technical Paper No. 40 "as used in the <br />computations of runoff for this memorandum. The volume of runoff "as computed <br />using I-hour, 25-year rainfall. Technical Paper No. 25 gave' .90 inches and <br />Technical Paper No. 40 gave 2.30 inches of rainfall. A compcrison of inflow <br />volume for each levee outlet is listed below. <br /> <br />Outlet <br />Designation Station <br /> <br />TP 110. 25 <br />~acre-r:e~i...) <br /> <br />TP No. 40 <br />(acre-feet) <br /> <br />South"es t <br />South <br />Southeast <br />North <br /> <br />107+50 <br />290+00 <br />473+00 <br />352+00N <br /> <br />37 <br />76 <br />126 <br />39 <br /> <br />49 <br />101 <br />166 <br />49 <br /> <br />7-14. Chart D-l, EM 1110-2-1410, "Interior Drainage of Leveed U' ban <br />. .t\reas: Hydrolo3Y." Ivhieh relates recurrence interval to ponding stages and <br />elf'........'"'<=; of urban develo""'::"'<:>Tlt \Jas used to analize 8ravity outlet dischargE' <br />requirCffients. Pending stc6es are classified as A, B, and C (degree of damage <br />in ascending order of value) and urban developments are classified as I, II, <br />and III (degree of urban development in descending order of value). Detailed <br />topographic information was used to correlate elevations to the three ponding <br />stages. All of the ponding areas "ere desigl ated as class III (relatively <br />10\,,-valued urban) indicating that the normal design limit of stage C should <br />have a recurrence interval of not less than 25 years. <br /> <br />:-15. Studies indicate,] the 25-year rainfall of 2.30 inches "ith a <br />coincident 5-year flood on the Arl~aIlsas River 'l;vas critical for determiniIlb <br />requireu ponding capacities. Storage of the entire 'runoff resulting frOl:1 the <br />I-hour, I-year recurrence interval rainfall of 0.9 inch "as computed for each <br />ponding area ana detcrrc..ined. to be less critical. FlOi.vs in the Arkansas River <br />greater than the 5-year recurrence interval flood HoulJ. be required to C07fl.- <br />pletely block the outlet structures and necessitate ponding the entire volufile <br />of interior runoff. <br /> <br />11 <br />