Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A portion of Monument Creek south of Woodman Road has been <br />channelized. Thi s improvement has' considerably reduced the extent of <br />the 100-year flooding in this area. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied in detail in the community, standard <br />hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a magnitude which <br />are expected to be equaled or exceeded!once on the average during any 10-, <br />50-, 100-, or SOO-year period (recurrence interval) have been selected as <br />having special significance for flood plain management and for flood <br />insurance rates. These events, commonly termed the 10-, 50-, 100-, and <br />SOO-year floods, have a 10, 2, 1, and p.2 percent chance, respectively, of <br />being equaled or exceeded during any year. Although the recurrence <br />interval represents the long-term average period between floods of a <br />specific magnitude, rare floods could occur at short intervals or even <br />within the same year. The risk of Elxperiencing a rare flood increases <br />when periods greater than 1 year are cpnsidered. For example, the risk of <br />having a flood which equals or exce~ds the 100-year flood (1 percent <br />chance of annual exceedence) in any iSO-year period is approximately 40 <br />percent (4 in 10), and, for any 90-year period, the risk increases to <br />approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). the analyses reported herein reflect <br />flooding potentials based on conditior)s existing in the community at the <br />time of completion of this study. :Maps and flood elevations will be <br />amended periodically to reflect future 'changes. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish the peak discharge- <br />frequency relationships for each: flooding source studied in detail <br />affecting the community. <br /> <br />Peak discharge-frequency relationships for streams studied in <br />Colorado Springs were developed: from one of four sources: (1) <br />material prepared by the COE (ReJ!erence 6), (2) existing flood plain <br />reports designated by the State of Colorado for flood plain <br />regulation, (3) from new hydrologic data developed by COM, or, <br />(4) from existing hydrologic reports by private firms. The following <br />discussion summarizes the hydrologic analysis and results for each <br />stream studied. ' <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis used fqr this Flood Insurance Study for <br />Fountain Creek was obtained fronj COE reports (References 6 and 7). <br />The hydrologic analysis in each was reviewed by the study contractor, <br />and the reports were found to: show a good correlation in peak <br />discharges at common points on Fo~ntain Creek in Colorado Springs for <br />all recurrence intervals. This hydrologic method, utilized in <br />Reference 6 and 7, consists of g4ge station analysis, whereby stream <br />gaging data have been analyzed tal estimate peak flows for the various <br />recurrence intervals. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />12 <br />