Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />inlo the measured responses. And if, in fact, the reach <br />does behave sufficiently like the calibration events for <br />the flood being studied, the hydrologic approach may be <br />nearly as accurate as any of the hydraulic routing <br />schemes for determining discharge. The difficulty, of <br />course, is in establishing the storage versus flow relation <br />pertinent to the subject flood. <br /> <br />5-12. Unsteady Flow Model <br /> <br />a. Unsteady flow equations. Derivations of the <br />unsteady flow equations are presented in numerous refer- <br />ences. Chow (1959), Fread (1978), and User's Manual <br />for UNET (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1991b)] are <br />three of such references. They can be obtained from the <br />two-dimensional equations presented in Chapter 4 by <br />assuming that the dependent variables only change in one <br />direction, x, and that direction is along the river axis <br />rather than being a cartesian coordinate. Common for- <br />mulations of the equations are as follows: <br /> <br />Equation of continuity <br /> <br />ilQ ilA dS_ <br />dX + dt + dt - qL <br /> <br />(5-2) <br /> <br />Equation of momentum <br /> <br />ilQ iJ(QV) (ilZ ) <br />dt +~ +gA dX +Sf =qL VL <br /> <br />(5-3) <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />Q = flow <br />A = active flow area <br />S = storage area <br />qL = lateral inflow per unit flow distance <br />V = Q I A = average flow velocity <br />g = acceleration of gravity <br />Z = water surface elevation <br />Sf = friction slope <br />V L = average velocity of the lateral inflow <br />x = flow distance <br />t = time <br /> <br />(1) The assumptions implicit 10 the unsteady flow <br />equations are essentially the same as those for the steady <br />flow equations: (a) the flow is gradually varied; that is, <br />there are no abrupt changes in flow magnitude or direc- <br />tion; (b) the pressure distribution is hydrostatic; therefore, <br />the vertical component of velocity can be neglected. <br />This means, for example, that the unsteady flow <br /> <br />EM 1110-2-1416 <br />15 Oct 93 <br /> <br />equations should not be used to analyze flow over a <br />spillway, and (c) the momentum correction factor is <br />assumed to be 1. <br /> <br />(2) The magnitude of each of the terms in the <br />momentum equation plays a significant role in the <br />hydraulics of the system. The terms in equation 5-3 are: <br /> <br />~ = local acceleration <br /> <br />~ = advective acceleration <br /> <br />ilz <br />dX = wa'er swface slope <br /> <br />Sf = friction slope <br /> <br />The water surface slope can be expressed as <br /> <br />ilz=ilh_S <br />dX dX 0 <br /> <br />(5-4) <br /> <br />in which h is the depth 3nd <br /> <br />iJh <br />dX = pressure term <br /> <br />So = bed slope <br /> <br />The roles of these terms are discussed below. <br /> <br />b. Weaknesses of the unsteady flow equations. <br /> <br />(1) Friction slope is the portion of the energy slope <br />which overcomes the shear force exerted by the bed and <br />banks, and it cannot be measured. To quantify the fric- <br />tion slope, the Manning or Chezy formulas for steady <br />flow are used: <br /> <br />Manning's Equation <br /> <br />S _ QIQln2 <br />f - 2.21A 2R 413 <br /> <br />(5-5) <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />5-23 <br />