My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01888
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01888
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:40:51 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:26:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Title
River Hydraulics
Date
10/15/1993
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EM 1110-2-1416 <br />15 Oct 93 <br /> <br />a. Stage data. Stage data are the most accurate type <br />of hydrologic data. Stage measurement is accurate 10 <br />within the amplitude of wind induced gravity waves and <br />the consistency of the recording device. Experience has <br />shown that gravity waves are typically about :I: 0.1 foot <br />in magnitude; see Figure 5-10. Traditional recording <br />devices, e.g., strip chart recorders and paper tapes, which <br />were predominant until the early 80's, tended to lose <br />their accuracy with time. Each month, when the gage <br />reader changed the tape, the aulomatic and the manual <br />gage readings were recorded. Usually the difference was <br />a couple of tenths of a foot although, occasionally, big <br />discrepancies were found. The recorded readings were <br />typically then adjusted by a linear relationship with time <br />to match the manual reading under the assumption that <br />the error increased gradually with time. The validity of <br />this assumption may be questionable. These errors, <br />which may be hidden, have bearing on how well the <br />model seems 10 match observed data. Another problem <br />is that gages sometimes lose their datum. Figure 5-11 <br />shows a comparison of the Des Plaines River stages at <br /> <br />421.2 <br /> <br />421.0 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />- <br />~ <br /> <br />Q) <br />g' 420.8 <br />~ <br />(/) <br />o <br />'00 <br />o <br />"0 <br />~ 420.6 <br />Q) <br />:::;: <br /> <br />III <br />'0 <br />c: <br />== 420.4 <br /> <br />420.2 <br /> <br />Lockport with those at Brandon Road Pool, which is <br />downstream. For 1974, Brandon Road is higher than <br />Lockport; hence, the Des Plaines River appears 10 be <br />flowing backwards. Which gage is correct? <br /> <br />(1) Newer gages have electronic recorders and trans- <br />mit data via satellite. Still, the gages are subject 10 the <br />similar losses of accuracy with time. Also, satellite <br />transmissions are subject to large errors which appear as <br />spikes in the time series. These spikes are easy to dis- <br />cern, but if they are input to a simulation they are <br />disastrous. <br /> <br />(2) Finally, point observations, say the 07:00 read- <br />ing, are often read from the hourly satellite time series. <br />Since the data may be oscillating (Figure 5-10) is one <br />point representative of the overall time series? <br /> <br />b. Flow data. Flow is usually a derived, not a mea- <br />sured quantity. Periodic flow measurements, using <br />velocity meters, are initially used 10 define a mting curve <br /> <br /><>p <br /> <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />40 80 <br />Time in hrs (Sept. 1986) <br /> <br />120 <br /> <br />Figura 5-10. Oscillation of the 1-hour time series from a satallite for the illinois River at Meredosia <br /> <br />5-14 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.