My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01888
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01888
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:40:51 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:26:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Title
River Hydraulics
Date
10/15/1993
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. Flow Classification: Open channel, Pressure, or <br />Both <br /> <br />. Flow Type: Steady - gradually or rapidly <br />varied Unsteady - gradually or <br />rapidly varied <br /> <br />. Locations of Controls: Subcritical reaches, supercrit- <br />ical reaches, transitions, struc- <br />tures, rating curves <br /> <br />. Boundary type: <br /> <br />Fixed or mobile <br /> <br />f. Other considerations. Once the study objectives, <br />funds, study time frame, data and personnel availability <br />are determined, several other important questions and <br />considerations should be made prior to selecting a partic- <br />ular numerical or physical model. These may include: <br /> <br />Are the data requirements of the model consistent <br />with the study Objectives? Personnel costs are <br />usually more significant than computer costs. <br /> <br />. Capacity of the model and available computer <br />hardware and software to provide information <br />required for the study. <br /> <br />. Adequacy of the theoretical basis of the numerical <br />model. <br /> <br />Degree 10 which the model has been tested and <br />verified. <br /> <br />Data requirements in relation 10 data availability and <br />amount of pre-processing required. Also, are the <br />available data proprietary or public? <br /> <br />Ease of application of the program. Faclors include <br />model documentation, input structure, diagnostic <br />capabilities, output structure, flexibility 10 display <br />output, and support. <br /> <br />Data management capabilities (e.g., ability to pass <br />information from one module to another). <br /> <br />. Ease of making program modifications, either in- <br />house or by contract. <br /> <br />Program efficiency in terms of typical run times and <br />costs. <br /> <br />Program accessibility. Can the program be run on a <br />computer that is convenient 10 access? Does it <br /> <br />EM 1110-2.1416 <br />15 Oct 93 <br /> <br />require a mainframe computer or special <br />hardware? <br /> <br />. Accessibility of user-support services (i.e., <br />consultation with someone who is thoroughly <br />familiar with the program). <br /> <br />. Quantity, accuracy, and availability of ready-to- <br />use input data for the study area <br /> <br />g. Summary. The following summary steps are <br />suggested as a procedure for selecting an appropriate <br />model for conducting river hydraulics studies. <br /> <br />(I) Defme study objectives and required products. <br />Identify project time and personnel availability. <br /> <br />(2) Summarize flow classification, state, regime and <br />type as outlined above and estimate the types of data, <br />amount of data, and quality of data needed 10 evaluate <br />the types of flow characteristics identified. <br /> <br />(3) Prepare a list of essential data needs in tabular <br />form. Data categories may include: <br /> <br />Hydrologic data (flow records, highwater marks, etc.) <br />Channel and floodplain geometry data <br />Sediment data <br />Geomorphologic and historical data <br />Other information (e.g., previous studies and reports) <br /> <br />(4) Are the data identified above readily available? <br />Also, are they of the quality and proximity 10 the study <br />site to be appropriate? Are the data proprietary or pub- <br />lic? How up-to-date are they? Develop lists of available <br />and missing data. <br /> <br />(5) Estimate the time and costs associated with the <br />collection of the missing data. <br /> <br />(6) Examine Tables 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4 and compare <br />to the results from the estimation of key hydraulic char- <br />acteristics. Select the most appropriate methods based on <br />results of this examination. <br /> <br />(7) Consider alternative methods based on results of <br />subsequent studies made such as the reconnaissance <br />study. Continually update and improve methods 10 meet <br />the specific needs of the study. <br /> <br />3-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.