My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01888
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01888
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:40:51 AM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:26:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Title
River Hydraulics
Date
10/15/1993
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EM 1110-2-1416 <br />15 Oct 93 <br /> <br />downstream from the study reach, preferably at a reliable <br />buundary condition. If starting conditions are DOt known, <br />the engineer must ensure that profile computations begin <br />sufficiently far downstream that any errors in estimating <br />starling water surface elevation will be eliminated by <br />profile convergence to the correct elevation downstream <br />of the study reach. This distance is mainly a function of <br />the stream slope. Additional guidance on selecting the <br />correct distance downstream of the study reach is given <br />in "Accuracy of Computed Water Surface Proftles" <br />(U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1986). <br /> <br />(3) The channel n value can be calibrated for various <br />flows if stage-discharge data are available (e.g. at a <br />gage). Once a match of computed and actual stages at a <br />gage site for in-bank flows is obtained, the channel n <br />may be held constant and the overbank n calibrated for <br />different historic floods. For one or more known dis- <br />charges, the computed proftle should be plotted and <br />compared with measured stages and highwater marl<s. It <br />should not be expected that the two will exactly coincide. <br />A successful calibration occurs when the computed pr0- <br />file is close to the majority of high water marl<s, with <br />some scatter allowed. Means to achieve a calibration <br />include changes 10 Manning's n, adjustments 10 <br />expansion/contraction coeffICients where warranted, mod- <br />ifications to effective flow boundaries, or 10 bridge <br />geometry descriptions. Typically, most of the adjust- <br />ments are 10 Manning's n. <br /> <br />(4) Considerable uncertainty exists in the estimation <br />of n, with estimates by experienced hydraulic engineers <br />commonly differing by :!:20 percent at the same stream <br />section (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1986). Thus, one <br />can reasonably justify an increase or decrease of this <br />magnitude to calibrate a model. The hydraulic engineer <br />should be cautious if an "unreasonable" adjustment 10 n <br />is required for calibration. Rigorous guidance on accept- <br />able calibration errors cannot be given. The judgment <br />and experience of the responsible hydraulic engineer and <br />reviewers is foremost. Rules of thumb of:l: I foot are <br />often used, but this criterion may not be acceplable for <br />all situations, particularly for steep streams. Some gen- <br />eral considerations for the calibration process are given <br />in Table 3-5. Figure 3-3 shows an example of satis- <br />factory water surface elevation calibration for a stream <br />reach. The process and rationale for calibration should <br />be documented in the study reports. <br /> <br />(5) Additional calibration data are necessary for the <br />application of two-dimensional, unsteady flow, and sedi- <br />ment transport models. Each chapter on the application <br />of the various methods provides information on model <br />calibration and verification. <br /> <br />d. Verification. The last step in the calibration pro- <br />cess is verificlition of the model. This operation is most <br />desirable, but is not always possible, often requiring <br />more data than is available. The verification process is <br /> <br />Table 3-5 <br />Data Gathering/Calibration Coneiderations <br /> <br />Obtain as many highwater marks (HWM) as possibla aIlar any significant flooding. no mattar how close togathar and how <br />inconsiSlant with nearby HWM's. Physically describe aach HWM location so that surveys may ba obtainad at a latar data. <br /> <br />Obtain highwatar marks upstream and downstream 01 bridges it possibla, so that tha affects causad by thase obstructions <br />can ba astimatad and so that bridge modeHng procedures may be confinned. <br /> <br />Chock on bridgalculvart debris blockagas with local residents. For urban streams. chack with residents and newspaper filas <br />on occurrences of bridge opening blockagas by automobilas or dabris. <br /> <br />For historical flooding, chock on land usa changas, both besin wide and local. sinca tha flood(s) occurred. <br /> <br />What has been happening to the stream sinca the last flood? Erosion or deposition that may have occurred sinca historic <br />floods. if significan~ wiH render calibration with today's channel configuration invalid. <br /> <br />If HWM's are taken from dabris lines. remamber that wave wash can resufi in the debris Hna baing higher than tha HWM. <br />partiCUlarly for pools. <br /> <br />Is the observer giving tha HWM biased? A homeowner may give an exaggeratad HWM if the owner thinks it might benafit <br />a project; the owner with a house for sale may give a low estimata or indicata no flooding occurs H halshe thinks it will <br />affect the sale. <br /> <br />3-12 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br />" <br /> <br />. <br />, <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />, <br />. <br /> <br />e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.