My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01831
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01831
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:02:47 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:24:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Fremont
Community
Canon City
Stream Name
Arkansas River &Tributaries
Title
Canon City Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan - The August 12, 1991 Flood
Date
8/1/1993
Prepared For
Canon City
Prepared By
Office of Emergency Management, FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8/26198 <br /> <br />Emergency Preparedness <br />and Flood Warning <br /> <br />Spotter network for Canon City <br /> <br />One of the most exciting opportunities for <br />flood hazard mitigation in is the development <br />of a local spotter network. A network of se- <br />lected volunteer observers in the vicinity <br />could be designated to monitor rainfall <br />amounts and stream levels in the Canon City <br />watersheds. This network of manned r,,;nfsll <br />observation stations would monitor local rain- <br />fall with standardized Rain Gauges so all re- <br />cords could be correlated and compiled into <br />evidence for informed decision-making, <br /> <br />In this proposed system, records would be <br />kept of daily rainfall but only heavy rainfall <br />accumulations would be relayed to a desig- <br />nated coordinator who could then effectively <br />calculate the potential for flood hazard. Rain- <br />fall information would be supplemented by <br />stream gauges placed at strategic points along <br />the major tributary streams. <br /> <br />Floodproofing for Business <br />and Homeowners <br /> <br />Many of the floodproofing techniques that <br />keep water away from a residence, such as <br />flood walls, levees, and structural sealing, <br />may require special treatment for openings <br />such as doors, windows, driveways, etc. These <br />closures act as shields to cover the gap and <br />prevent water from entering, and can be of a <br />variety of shapes, sizes, and materials. <br /> <br />In some cases closures are permanently at- <br />tached using hinges so that they can remain <br />open when there is no flood threat. They may <br />be portable, normally stored in a convenient <br />location and slipped into place when a flood <br />threatens, In certain situations, when flood- <br /> <br />Canon City Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan <br /> <br />ing is of very low level, usually less than one <br />foot, some method of enclosing low entrances <br />such as basement doors or window wells <br />might be a satisfactory option. In any case, <br />there are a number of elements involved in <br />d~signing and using a closure system. <br /> <br />In areas of shallow, low velocity flooding, clo- <br />sures can be used on doors, windows, vents, <br />and other building openings. However, the <br />first step with the use of closures placed di- <br />rectly on buildings is to be certain that both <br />the closure and the wall systems are strong <br />enough and sufficiently watertight to with- <br />stand flood pressures. The use of closures <br />directly on a structure is considered to be part <br />of the sealing process. <br /> <br />Closures can be considered as an option only <br />if a flooding situation provides sufficient time <br />to install the closures. The need for both warn- <br />ing time and "human intervention" is critical, <br />since all closure system require personnel to <br />install them and make certain they are prop- <br />erly sealed. <br /> <br />Closures that are stored between floods must <br />be readily accessible. The effectiveness of an <br />entire closure system will be compromised if <br />the closures are stored such that flooding ren- <br />ders them inaccessible, or if even one closure <br />is improperly installed. <br /> <br />CLOSURE <br />PANEL <br /> <br /> <br />CLOSURE <br />TRACK <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />,Iill <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Figure 14 - Example of a 'drop-in' cWsure <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.