Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />FLOOD REPORT <br />ARKANSAS RIVER BASI~ <br /> <br />by mechanical lifting (due to the upslope of the terrain) and conver- <br />gence (due to the low-level pressure pattern), produced phenomenal <br />rains and calalllitous floods. Plates 2 and 3 showdatly surface and <br />upper air (SOO millibar) weather maps for the period 13-19 June 1965. <br /> <br />I'LOOO OF J(lNE 1965 <br />r.0r.ORAOO, K^,'I;S,~S. & NEW \If,nCO <br /> <br />HiTRODlJCTION <br /> <br />b. 14JWle.- A layer of moist tropical air (!orn was spread- <br />lng northward through Texas and along the eastern border of New Mexico <br />and eastern Colorado. A cold front waS being driven upslope through <br />northeastern and east-central Colorado early in the day by increasingly <br />higher pressure developing over the central_plains states. !be air <br />associated with this front, already moist and unstable, continued to <br />be pushed upslope over the eastern plains of Colorado. The mechanical <br />liftin~ plus lower-level convergence in the vicinity of the cold front <br />WaS further assisted in producing excessively heavy local showers by <br />colder air in the upper levels (_100 C at 18,000 ft. MSL). The surface <br />front at this ti~e extended from South Carolina to southeastern Kansas <br />and northward through central Nebraska to join another front in north- <br />western South Dakota. This second front extended in a south~sterly <br />direction fro~ the junctur<! in South Oakota through southeastern <br />Wyoming, northwestern Colorado, central Utah, and turned southward as <br />it entered eastern Nevada, thence in a southerly direction to Baja <br />California. A small squall line extended through Trinidad nnd Pueblo, <br />Colorado, during the early morning hours. The 5DOlllillibar chart shown <br />on plate 3 indicates a trough approximately oVer the west coast. <br /> <br />1. AU1'flORITY.- The final report of the flood of June 1965 is <br />made in compliance with paraf{raph 172.S20fEM500-1_1. Aflood <br />emergency (Phase III, Category E flood) on the Arkansas River and <br />tri~utarics WaS declared on l~ June 1965 in accordance with the pro- <br />v is ion s of parag raph 1 ~ I ..1 ~ 0 f t~l C ,~1 huq uerque Oi strict's Annex A, <br />Emergency Flood Control Activities, to E~ 500-1-1. A flood emergency <br />(~hase 'I, Category B flood) on the Canadian River and tributaries also <br />Was <1eelared on 16 June 1965. Flood fighting and data collection activ- <br />ities were commenced under authorities contained in paragraphs 121.343, <br />122.345, IB2.70, and 182.72 of EM 500-1-1. <br /> <br />2. SCOPE.- The report covers the Arkansas River and tributaries <br />in Colorado. the Arkansas River from the Colorado-Kansas State line to <br />Great Bend, Kansas, and tho Canadian River and tributaries above Conchas <br />Reservoir in New Mexico. It inCludes a description of the storm and <br />runoff; extent and magnitude of flooding, flood da~ages, and flood emer_ <br />gency activities by Federal, state, and local governments and organi- <br />~ations; flood regulation by existing projects and benefits derivod <br />therefrom, henefits expected to acCrue from authori~ed projects; and <br />a bibliography. The report also contains supporting data in the form <br />of tables and plates. Plate I is a general map of the area. <br /> <br />STORM DESCRIPTION <br /> <br />c. 15.Tulle.- Movement of the first front continued south- <br />ward and reached northeastern New Mexico by noon. The inflow of sur- <br />face moisture increased up to an average of 13 grams per kilogram <br />through the lower 5,000 feet and thus, enhanced the instability of the <br />atmosphere. The trough at SOD mho had moved a few hundred miles inland. <br />d. 16 June.- A slight warming of the upper atmosphere along <br />with less than normal daytime heating due to considerable cloud cover <br />decreased the instability temporarily during the daylight hours. Sur_ <br />face temperatures averaged about 10. F COoler than the previous day. <br />A marked increase in cyclonic flow in the upper atmospheric levels set <br />the stage for heavy rains during the night of 16-17 June. At about <br />this time the second front lay in a general north-south alignment along <br />the Front and Sangre de Cristo Ranges. A squall line developed along <br />an arc through Trinidad, Colorado,and Cheyenne, Wyoming. <br /> <br />3. SYNOPTIC SITUATJI)!I.- <br /> <br />a. G<1r.eroL- The f1ood-prouucing rains of 13-19 June 1%5 <br />were the culmination of a strong and persistent weather pattern which <br />i,,:ul cxisted over the "este= IJnitedStates fornhout four months. The <br />.~cneral pattern of t!le upper-level windf1o~' was out of the Gulf of <br />i\lnska, down the west coast, acrOSS southern California, back up th rough <br />ArizonllandNewMexico, and over the high plains. This general pllttern <br />of upper-air circulation was present throughout the storm period and <br />waS most pronounced on 16-17 June with unseasonably cool air at 20,000 <br />feet. Byl4June,theincreasingsurfacepressuresovertheeentra1 <br />plains, coupled with a low-pressure area centerod over Chihuahua, <br />"lexico, induced an inf.lew of moist r.ulf air into northeastern New Me~ico <br />and eastern Colorado. damming it up a~ainst the Rocky Mountains beneath <br />the cold air aloft. This combination of surface and upper air conditions <br />rcsultecl in extremely llnstable atmospheric conditions and, reinforced <br /> <br />e. 17 June.- Drying and some cooling of the upper layers of <br />the at1llOsphere were noticeable early on the 17th. Thesefactors,accom- <br />paniedbyincreasedcyclonicflowintheupperlayers,contrihlItedto <br />increased instability. This system moved northward through Colorado <br />during the day. Simultaneously, the Jet Stream was present over Colo- <br />rado. <br /> <br />, <br />