Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />" <br />" <br />f- <br />:0 <br /> <br />I <br />(a,FNWOODSPRlN(~' <br />I <br /> <br />% \ 1"0.,. <br />~ I ~, .", <br />,-;;-I-.L <br />~ ~/ <br />~\ <br />/ I " <br />/ <br />I <br />I, <br />..\~O" <br />(,oJ';" -----' <br />", <br />,.\ I <br />I. <br />, <br />~ <br />I ~ <br />--J~ <br />o <br /> <br />--", <br />) <br />, <br />\ <br /> <br />/;;;:;;-1 <br />_DELTA < <br />I , <br />IMON7'ROSE C1J:"""\- -,'- <br />I </ <br />\. "b.t- ./. <br />_ --1 ",e 1'/,. ! /~-'-- <br />\MOr-TJ./OSF "'.,. . l~ <br /><:";\ -~W'''''SAIU-'l <br />'7,\ I " I, <br />. .' <br />, 'I <br />,.., --~- -1 \ '< <br />OURAY CO. "!:. \ ~ .....J ' ": <br />'". \ IS <br />" \\" / 1 <br />';,) j '> <br /> <br /> <br />I, <br />s <br />, <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br />s <br />^ <br />, <br />if <br />'- <br /> <br />s <br />^ <br />, <br />if <br />, - <br /> <br />"0" <br />C<!'(.c.c- <br /> <br /> <br />/----/ <br /> <br />o <br />co <br />" <br />'" <br />o <br />..l <br />o <br />U <br /> <br />/ <br />'0' / <br /><<,f,{,/ <br />1011>'__ co- <br />---~vt<;J...'(" <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />FIGURE 4 <br />Study Reach with HvdrolOQic Points <br />lIa,;nBounda,,' <br />Co>untyLine <br />City G"l(< [:}, <br />SCAI.E, One inch "'IUa!> Iippr<,~imat.ly 16 miles <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />COLORADO RIVER BASIN <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD 3/1/5 <br /> <br />, <br />-'- <br /> <br />3.0 <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br /> <br />3.1 E"istin~ Data <br /> <br />Forlocalions wherc existing detailed bydrologic analyses were availab1c,thos e analyses were used <br />to obtain peak 50-year and lOo-year flows. For other locations, statistical analyses of:.1ream <br />gages and existing regional hydrologic anaI>'ses were examined. As is explained in the next <br />paragraph,thoseanalyses were found to be inconsistent with the existing adopted anaIy sesand <br />were not used for tllls report. <br /> <br /> <br />A draft floodplain study being jointly prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the <br />CWCB WId published FEMII. studies provided 50-year and lOO-year flows for much of the study <br />reach. Corps of Engineers flows were available for the Colorado River from Rifle, Colorado, at <br />the upstream limit of this study, downstream to DeBeque Canyon. FEMII. flows were available <br />for the Colorado River from Palisade, Colorado downstream to Froita. The USGS performed <br />frequency analyses on gage locations near DeBeque, near Cameo and near the stateline, The <br />USGS gage analysis values were lower than the Corps values by 7 to 10 percent. In order to <br />maintain consistency, the Corps values were selected for this srudy. <br /> <br />3.2 New Hvdrolollic Information <br /> <br />Th~ remaining hydrologic points can be divided into two groups: Group I) Three hydrologic <br />points were located within reaches that had already been studied by detailed methods, b utthere <br />weren't any published flow values for those specific points; Group 2) Two points were in <br />r~aches downstream of the SalO Hydrology Report, so th~y had not previously been analyzed. <br />Hydrologic analyses of the 50-year and lOO-year flood flows for the hydrologic points in Group <br />1 were performed through interpolation of known flow values. Since d~tailed informatioll already <br />existed, the flows were not used to compute lk......d depths and no changes wcre made to the <br />detailed floodplain maps. (The flow vaJu~ are provided in this report simply for information <br />purposes.) <br /> <br />The known values for points near the Group 1 points were entered into a curve fitting computer <br />program whieh seleets an equation that provides a c10se description of the plo Itedeurve. Flow <br />values for the three Group I locations on the Colorado River (river miles 80-75, 42-45 and 25- <br />28) wcre caleulated. A similar procedurc involving extrapolation instead ofintcrpolation was <br />us<:d for the hydrologic points in Group 2 (river miles 0-10 and 10-12). The curve fitting <br />program computed the flows at these locations by using the corresponding drainage areas at each <br />location. Table j summarizes the data at the selected hydrologic locations. The equation tor the <br />Colorado River below Rille is: <br /> <br />where: <br /> <br />Q"'k*A' <br />Q=50-yearor IOO.yearflow; <br />A=dralnagearea; <br />k"uconstatlt; and <br />~ .. an exponent <br /> <br />10 <br />