Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for the four frequency floods, and discharges for the san Miguel <br />River were determined from these regional curves. <br /> <br />The peak discharges for Hieroglyphics Canyon and Happy Canyon Creek <br />were determined by the study contractor in April 1979 (Reference 8). <br />A regional floodflow frequency analysis was performed on gaging <br />station data from the study basin, from which drainage area discharge <br />curves were derived. A mixed population of rainfall and snowmelt <br />data was used. The results of this analysis were combined statis- <br />tically to give a maximum flow for both events. Regional curves <br />of drainage area versus discharge were computed for the four fre- <br />quency floods. <br /> <br />The peak discharges for Cedar Creek, Dry Cedar Creek, and Montrose <br />Arroyo were determined by the Colorado Water Conservation Board in <br />April 1979 (Reference 4). <br /> <br />Rainfall data for the Colorado Water Conservation Board study were <br />statistically analyzed to define recurrence interval probabilities <br />and the resultant rainfall-frequency relationship for both of the <br />upper basin areas, as well as the City of Montrose. This rainfall <br />relation was then graduated between the City of Montrose and the <br />upper basin areas according to the predominant regional precipita- <br />tion pattern shown in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminis- <br />tration Atlas (Reference 9). <br /> <br />For the overall flood plain analysis, the runoff hydrographs were <br />developed by using the U.S. Soil Conservation Service procedure <br />for each of the individual subbasins. All channel routings were <br />developed using the Muskingum procedure. This process was accom- <br />plished for the various subbasins comprising each of the three <br />major basins (Cedar Creek, Montrose Arroyo, and Dry Cedar Creek). <br />The result was composite hydro graphs at each design point, for <br />each design storm. <br /> <br />The impact of snowmelt was examined and included for the overall <br />flood plain analysis. Snowmelt impacts peak flow rate as it estab- <br />lishes the base streamflow to which the peak flow is added. Numerous <br />drainage basins, judged to be reasonably similar to the study basins, <br />for which snowmelt data are available were examined. From these <br />data, the 100-year frequency snowmelt relation of flow to drainage <br />basin area was defined for the Montrose study area. These data, <br />in turn, were used to define the snowmelt-frequency flow relation. <br />The snowmelt-frequency flow curve was then statistically combined <br />with the corresponding curve based on rainfall. Snowmelt data and <br />rainfall data were combined after the rainfall-generated runoff <br />hydro graphs for the various subbasins were combined. <br /> <br />Ditch crossings in the study basins, <br />South Canal, were all handled in the <br />of the hydrograph routing procedure. <br /> <br />with the exception of the <br />same manner for the purposes <br />The ditches were assumed to <br /> <br />18 <br />