Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I'"" 'to <br /> <br />Question raised most often by the public and <br />elected officials concerned the use of the <br />lOO-year storm as the major design storm. Many <br />people questioned the need to invest so much <br />money to provide protection from an event which <br />might occur in their lifetimes. <br /> <br />This experience causes one to wonder how <br />many proposed storm drainage programs across the <br />country have fail ed because the publi c, through <br />their elected officials, do not find the IOO-year <br />flood an acceptable criterion for the design of <br />major drainage improvements. Some communi ties <br />may find the adoption of a less stringent design <br />criteria, based perhaps on the 50-year stann, <br />will reduce the public resistance to the imple- <br />mentation of capital improvement fees. Such a <br />change in criteria might well mean the difference <br />between succeSSfully implementing a storm drain- <br />age program or not, at a fairly small reduction <br />in the level of protection provided. <br /> <br />11.000 <br /> <br /> <br />0,'00 <br /> <br />1-,- <br /> <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />""'" <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />:0 <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />.... 4,OOC <br />~ <br />g <br /> <br />'1 <br />!' <br /> <br />,. <br />, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />, <br />REDLiCT~ F':"':~VR <br /> <br />.'.... <br /> <br />*This nomograph was originally developed for the <br />average sized subdivision in Fort Collins {40 to <br />60 acres}. The nomograpn can be "adjusted" for <br />subdivisions of different areas using the following <br />formula: <br /> <br />where: <br /> <br />V' V (1.2A-0.05) <br />V' volume of on-site detention adjusted <br />for area, in cubic feet per acre. <br />V volume of on-site detention provided, <br />in cubic feet per acre. <br />A = tributary area, in acres. <br />, <br /> <br />The adjusted volume, V'. should be entered into the <br />no~graph to obtain the appropriate reduction fac- <br />tor. <br /> <br />Figure 2. On-site detention reduction <br />factor nomograph. <br /> <br />,I; <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br />- <br />u <br />" <br />~ <br />.~ <br /> <br />Summary/Conclusions <br /> <br />Stormwater is indeed a difficult resource to <br />manage. Natural drainageways, creeks and rivers, <br />man-made irrigation features such as lakes and <br />canals, and more recent storm drainage facilities <br />including open channels, storm sewers and deten- <br />tion ponds are interwoven in a large and c~~plex <br />drainage system, and are an integral part of the <br />overall urban environment. Thorough analysis~ <br />made possible by recent advances in .drainage <br />technology, has shown that policies of the past <br />have been unable to keep pace with many cities1 <br />rapid growth. Floods have occurred in the past <br />and will continue to occur if the inadequacies of <br />the exi sti n9 drai nage system remai n uncorrected. <br /> <br />But avoiding potential flood damage is only <br />a part of the picture. Associated concerns such <br />as ineffective maintenance operations. nuisance <br />flooding, and potential liability must also be <br />addressed. Experience has shown that continued <br />urbanization dramatically affects the drainage <br />system, requiring local government to consider <br />not only existing drainage problems. but to <br />anticipate and address the drainage concerns of <br />the future. <br /> <br />This paper has attempted to share some of <br />the key elements in the City of Fort Collins' <br />plan for effective stonnwater management. The <br />pri nc ; pIes estab 1 i shed in the ordi nance of 1976 <br />provide a firm foundation for later policies and <br />decisions. Dividing the city into separate <br />drainage basins and preparing individual basin <br />master plans has allowed us to fit the many <br />pieces of the storm drainage puzzle together and <br />see the bigger picture. Collecting the diverse <br />storm drainage activities of the City into a <br />single unit - a utility - with its own staff. <br />regul ations, budget and sources of revenue ~ has <br />enabled us to give 5tormwater management a focus <br />so that drainage problems can be solved. The <br />monthly utility fee for operations and mainte- <br />nance has increased the effectiveness of the <br />existing drainage program. The new utility and <br />basin fees for cap-ital improvements provide <br />. for the cons tructi on of the storm drai nage <br />facilities necessary to correct todays problems <br />and meet the needs of the future. And work.ing to <br />enhance the publ i c awareness of storm drai nage <br />issues has secured the successful implementation <br />. o-f-thh major' new program~ . .---~-- ---~_., ,- <br /> <br />The development of a comprehensive stonn- <br />water management has been an evolutionary pro- <br />cess. Changes in technol 09Y, in management <br />strategies and in the public attitude toward <br />storm drainage have shaped Fort Collins' stann- <br />water program. It is a sound program, based on <br />the best available information and developed over <br />a period of years, aimed at providing a safe and <br />effective drainage system for the residents of <br />Fort Collins at a fair and reasonable cost. <br /> <br />But stormwater management must co"tinue to <br />be an evol ut i onary process. chang; og a s the <br />pub 1 i c and the City 1 earn more about storm <br />drainage, adapting 'to changing corrrnunity percep- <br />tions and needs. Only in this manner can our <br />goal of effective overall management of our <br />unique stormwater resource be achieved. <br /> <br />531 <br />