Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Obtained by application , <br /> J of rainfall intensity ratios i <br /> K: I <br /> ..... I <br /> ........... I , <br /> Obtained by extrapolation <br /> l:J. ~ of regression line <br /> ~ o ' <br /> - ~ <> .!.-J. I <br /> AEP ---(}l '. <br />... 1:2000 '. <br /> '. , <br />. 1:10DD " i <br /> - +i " ~ ...... ..... <br />. 1:500 I + I .... ..... <br /> t , V <br />. 1:200 I l~ 4- . <br /> .--- ~._~----- - - ____._._L. -- <br />" 1:10D Note: fiDed symbols denote original design values and <br />+ 1:50 hollow symbols denote interpolated/extrapolated estimates <br /> , . , , ' , , . , , , <br /> <br />10 <br />Duration (hours) <br /> <br />Figiin. 6 Sc;k8llUltle lllllstndlon of extrapolatil)n of regioAaf design estimMes frQlll kmger <br />to shorter durations. <br /> <br />....."'" I.... <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />estimates appear linear in the log-log domain; note <br />that extrapolation below 12 hours should not be <br />attempted as the basic estimates obtained from Book <br />II Section 1 have been derived for 1. 12 and 72 hour <br />durations and intermediate durations have been <br />interpolated. <br /> <br />S. Compute ratios of rainfall depth/intensities for different <br />AEPs to that of a reference AEP (e.g. the 1 in 100 <br />AEP event) for the lower limit of duration obtained <br />from the linear relationship of steps 3 and 4. <br /> <br />6. Apply these ratios to the reference AEP design rainfall <br />depthfJntensities of shorter durations to obtain <br />corresponding rainfall intensities for AEPs rarer than 1 <br />in 100. <br /> <br />7. Apply areal reduction factors to the point rainfall <br />estimates to convert to areal values. <br /> <br />A worked example of the above procedure is provided <br />in Section 622. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(c) Range of application <br /> <br />In the schematic illustration presented in Figure 6, the <br />linear relationship used to extrapolate down to shorter <br />durations is limited to 18 hours, as it is seen that the two <br />distinctive linear segments for the 1 in 50 AEP and 1 in 100 <br />AEP design values range between 2 and 12 hours, and 18 <br />to 72 hours. In other situations the linear relationship in <br />step 3 above can be extended to 12 hours. This linear <br />relationship can also be used to interpolate design rainfalls <br />for intennediate durations (e.g. 36 hours). <br /> <br />The assumption implicit in step 6 of the procedure is <br />that the extrapolated frequency curves for all shorter <br />durations are parallel when plotted on a log-probability <br />graph. The appropriateness of this assumption for low AEP <br />design rainfall estimates should be tested by comparison <br />with corresponding PMP estimates, particularly for <br />durations shorter than say 6 hours. Judgement is required <br />to determine how well the linear relationship in the <br />logarithmic domain holds for durations longer than 72 <br />hours. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />100 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.E <br />E <br />oS <br />'" <br />'in <br />~ 10 <br />:E <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />c: <br />'iij <br />'" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />..........'" v. ~ ~"U"'cUIVII VI L""YO:;: tv II;;;^Uell'l; r IV....U.. <br /> <br />3.7 Seasonal Estimates of Large to Extreme <br />Rainfalls <br /> <br />(a) Theoretical and practical issues <br /> <br />In some situations, Large to Extreme design rainfall <br />estimates may be required for specific seasons within the <br />year (see Section 4.6). While there are a number of design <br />situations in which it would appear sensible to derive <br />seasonal estimates, there are a number of practical and <br />theoretical issues that are not easily resolved. Some of the <br />issues related to the derivation of seasonal design rainfalls <br />include: <br /> <br />. Seasonal estimates for Large events. Seasonal <br />design rain tails for AEPs equal to or more frequent <br />than 1 in 100 cannot be obtained directly from <br />information provided in BODk II, Section 1. One <br />approach is to extract seasonal maxima from rainfall <br />records at a particular site, and then undertake a <br />frequency analysis to derive seasonal rainfalls (the <br />Bureau of Meteorology can provide these estimates if <br />required). This approach can provide inconsistent <br />seasonal estimates for the larger events because of <br />the inherent uncertainties in fitting the tails of the <br />distribution to observed data, though theoretically this <br />could be overcome by developing a fitting procedure <br />that jointly fits all the seasonal distributions. In <br />addition. the seasonal design rainfalls derived from <br />the at-site data will need to be adjusted to ensure that <br />the annual design rainfalls are consistent with the <br />ARR design estimates (the potential for discrepancies <br />between at-site frequency estimates and ARR values <br />is discussed in Section 3.2a). <br /> <br />. Seasonal estimates for Rare events. At present there <br />are no regional frequency estimates of seasonal <br />rainfalls known to be available for AEPs rarer than 1 in <br />100. While there is no theoretical reason why a <br />procedure such as CRC-FORGE could not be applied <br />to seasonally censored data from a <br />hydrometeorologically homogeneous region, the <br />resources required tD undertake the analysis would be <br />considerable. <br /> <br />100 <br />