Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />reported on Figure 17 for the 10-, 50- and lOa-year flood <br />frequencies represent the relative extent and impact of each <br />flood event. The discharge information is usable not only <br />for flood plain regulation but also for planning, engineering <br />and flood plain improvement. <br /> <br />of failure or damage is economically feasible and the hazard to <br />life and property is lower or non-existent. <br /> <br />The lOa-year flood event, which can be expected to occur at any <br /> <br /> <br />time in a given area, based upon recorded historical precipita- <br /> <br /> <br />tion and other valid data, has a one percent chance of being <br /> <br /> <br />equalled or exceeded during anyone year. The lOa-year flood <br /> <br /> <br />event provides a lower risk of failure than the la-year or <br /> <br /> <br />50-year flood event, when considering structural flood plain <br /> <br /> <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Flood magnitudes greater than the lOa-year flood magnitude can <br />and will occur. Land improvement adjacent to the lOa-year flood <br />plain limit should consider the remote chance for possible flood <br />damage. <br /> <br />The lOa-year flood event is considered by the Urban Drainage & <br /> <br /> <br />Flood Control District, the Colorado Water Conservation Board, <br /> <br /> <br />and the Federal Insurance Administration as the flood magnitude <br /> <br /> <br />for which flood plains should be designated for regulatory and <br /> <br /> <br />improvement purposes. In Colorado, the lOa-year flood plain <br />represents an area of state interest as defined in H.B. 1041. <br /> <br />The lOa-year flood discharges on Second and Third Creeks are <br /> <br /> <br />greatly affected by the Fulton Ditch, the Union Pacific Railroad <br /> <br /> <br />and U.s. 85. At each of these locations, flood flows from Second <br /> <br /> <br />Creek are diverted into Third Creek because of insufficient <br /> <br /> <br />capacity and obstructions at these crossings. A summary of the <br /> <br /> <br />lOa-year flow diversion used in this flood plain analysis is <br /> <br /> <br />provided in Tables 4, 5, and 6. <br /> <br />The 10- and 50-year recurrence flood magnitudes have also been <br /> <br /> <br />calculated at various design points along each creek. These <br /> <br /> <br />flood magnitudes represent events which can cause severe damage <br /> <br /> <br />but would not inundate the area characteristic of a lOa-year <br /> <br /> <br />event. The peak flows for these events should be used in the <br /> <br /> <br />planning and engineering of improvements where the higher risk <br /> <br />Theoretically, it is conceivable that flood waters, once diverted <br /> <br /> <br />north along the Union Pacific Railroad and U.S. 85 embankments, <br /> <br /> <br />could continue flowing north into the southern limits of Brighton. <br /> <br /> <br />However, the flatness of the area, the many county road embank- <br /> <br /> <br />ments and irrigation ditches which cross the path of such an <br /> <br /> <br />extreme flood plain, and the agricultural use of the potential <br /> <br /> <br />flood plain land with a permeable surface would tend to dispute <br /> <br /> <br />the possibility of such a circumstance. Regardless, future county <br /> <br /> <br />and city planning should consider possible ground contouring <br /> <br /> <br />revisions north of Third Creek to eliminate any possibility of <br /> <br /> <br />such a flood occurrence. <br />