My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01780
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01780
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:02:47 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:21:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
445
County
Teller
Community
Cripple Creek
Stream Name
Pony Gulch, Poverty Gulch
Title
Floodplain Management Study - Cripple Creek, Colorado
Date
12/1/1992
Designation Date
3/1/1997
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Time of concentration values were computed from an emperical equation <br />in Soil Conservation service Engineering Field Manual - Chapter 2, <br />intended for small rural watersheds. <br /> <br />Rather than repeat review further details of the hydrology analysis, <br />we refer to the previously mentioned drainage master plan which has <br />good documentation of the methodology used. <br /> <br />Tc_[L~O.8((1000ICN)_9)~O.7]/1140(Y^O.5) <br />1'c= time of concentration in hours <br />L= flow length in feet <br />eN" runoff curve number <br />y~ average watershed slope <br /> <br />Table 1 <br /> <br />Runoff Curve Numbers (eN) <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> <br />Land Use <br /> <br />Alluvium <br />Along Streams <br /> <br />Hillside <br /> <br />Y"lOOCI!A <br />y= average watershed slope in percent <br />A- drainage area in square feet <br />Ia contour interval in feet <br />C~ total contour length in feet <br />It was determined by representatives of the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board, Soil Conservation Service, and GMS Inc. at a <br />meeting on January 6, 1992 that the Rational Formula (Q . CIA) should <br />be used in making peak discharge determinations. This method was <br />selected because of its applicability to small drainage areas, local <br />drainage design and its simplicity of use by land development related <br />technicians. <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> <br />Open Space (Parks etc) " " <br />Residential <br />1/4 ac lots " " <br />1/2 ac lots 70 " <br />1 ac lots " " <br />Commercial & Business " " <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> <br />The TR-20 discharge values developed for this study were used for <br />calibratin~ the Rational Formula in regards to the runoff coefficients <br />(C values). <br />since the SCS 24 hour type II rainfall distribution was used in TR-20, <br />it should also be used to determine rainfall intensity values (I). <br />Most of the application of the rational formula will be for small <br />drainage areas where the time of concentration is less than 30 <br />minutes. Therefore a rainfall duration of 30 minutes was selected to~ <br />determining I. The greatest 30 minute intensity from the SCS 24 hour <br />type II rainfall distribution produces 37.8 % of the total 24 hour <br />rainfall depth. This 30 minute rainfall depth was determined for each <br />storm frequency of interest and then converted to inches per hour for <br />use as I, see Table 2. <br /> <br />Table 2 <br /> <br />Rainfall Intensity I <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> <br />10 yr <br /> <br />Frequency <br />50 yr <br /> <br />100 yr <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> <br />24 tir Frecip (In) <br />30 Min Precip (In) <br /> <br />2.U3 <br /> <br />3.25 <br /> <br />3.93 <br /> <br />0.77 <br /> <br />1.23 <br /> <br />1.49 <br /> <br />I (In/Hr) <br /> <br />1.53 <br /> <br />2.46 <br /> <br />2.97 <br /> <br />------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> <br />The rational formula was rearranged (C=Q/IA) to compute C values using <br />previously determined Q and A values from TR-20 data, and I values <br />previously discussed. A relationship uetwe~n C values and curve <br />numbers (CN) fro~ TR-20 was established. CN values for the TR-20 <br />watersheds reflect weighted average CNs for a variety of land use~ and <br />soils within each watershed. The CNs generally did not exceed the low <br />80s. Since the rational equation may be used for smaller individual <br />land uses and soils, such as a city block of commercial buildings, the <br />CNs from TR-20 may not be sufficiently site specific. Therefore for <br />land uses with CNs greater than the low 80s, a table (Table 14-1) from <br />the "Handbook of Applied Hydrology" by Ven Te Chmol was useful in <br />selecting C values for more site specific types of land uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.