My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01774
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01774
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:02:47 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:20:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Otero
Community
La Junta
Title
Analysis of Hydrologic Factors that Affect Grond-Water Levels in the Arkansas River Alluvial Aquifer near La Junta Colorado 1959-99
Date
1/1/2000
Prepared For
La Junta
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />the Colorado Water Conservation Board, conducted a <br />study in 1999 to analyze hydrologic factors that affect <br />ground-water levels in the Arkansas River alluvial <br />aquifer. This report presents the results of that study. <br />More specifically, the report describes water-table <br />conditions in March 1999, historical water levels, and <br />hydrologic factors that affect water levels. <br /> <br />The study was limited to the area between the <br />Fort Lyon Canal and the Arkansas River from the Fort <br />Lyon Canal headgate east to the Otero County line <br />(fig. I). The description of March 1999 conditions is <br />based on water level measurements made in 49 wells. <br />The description of earlier conditions (generally 1959 <br />through 1998) is based on time-series records for <br />ground-water levels, ground-water withdrawals, appli- <br />cations of ground water and surface water for irriga- <br />tion, discharge in the Arkansas River, diversions to the <br />Fort Lyon Canal, and channel conditions in the <br />Arkansas River. The study was limited to data that are <br />maintained in a computer system, or archived as <br />digital records. <br /> <br />Previous Investigations <br /> <br />Several hydrologic investigations have been <br />completed in the study area. The results of these inves- <br />tigations are valuable sources of background informa- <br />tion to interested readers. Konikow and Bredehoeft <br />(1974) characterized the study area as part of a <br />ground-water modeling investigation of ground-water <br />flow and chemistry. Walls and Lunsford (1992) <br />modeled several different water-management alterna- <br />tives designed to affect changes in water-table condi- <br />tions in the study area. Using a digital model that <br />characterized ground-water levels in the area as sensi- <br />tive to leakage from the Arkansas River, leakage from <br />the Fort Lyon Canal, and ground-water withdrawals, <br />they found that most alternatives would have relatively <br />local effects although modifications to the Arkansas <br />River channel could change ground-water levels <br />throughout the area. Goff and others (1998), provided <br />a modeling analysis of the effects of irrigation in the <br />study area and found that salinity of ground water and <br />surface water was related to irrigation activities. The <br />report by Goff and others (1998) is the source of many <br />data used in this study. Dash (1995) reported on the <br />irrigation water use for the Fort Lyon Canal and docu- <br />mented losses from the canal. <br /> <br />Acknowledgments <br /> <br />The assistance of certain agencies and individ- <br />uals were critical to the completion of this study. In <br />particular, Lloyd Wadleigh and Don Taylor, from Divi- <br />sion II office of the Colorado Division of Water <br />Resources located in La Junta, were extremely helpful <br />with records available from their office that were used <br />for identifying and locating wells for the March 1999 <br />water-level measurements. In addition, many land- <br />owners provided access to wells that were measured; <br />without this access, it would not have been possible to <br />characterize water-table conditions in March 1999. <br /> <br />WATER-TABLE CONDITIONS IN <br />MARCH 1999 <br /> <br />To document current water-table conditions, the <br />water table was mapped in the spring of 1999 on the <br />basis of measurements from 49 wells. Wells were <br />identified and depths to water from a point where the <br />land surface elevation could be estimated were <br />measured between March 9 and March 19, 1999. the <br />results of those measurements are listed in table I. <br />During the measurement period, flow in the Fort Lyon <br />Canal was steady but relatively low, about 100 to <br />200 cubic feet per second, and flow in the Arkansas <br />River at La Junta varied from about 50 to 150 cubic <br />feet per second. <br />The depth-to-water measurements were <br />converted to elevations of the water-table surfacE, and <br />the resultant elevations were contoured by hand 1:0 <br />produce a generalized water-table map for the study <br />area that is shown in figure 2. Estimates of land- <br />surface elevations were made using I :24,000-SC2Je <br />topographic maps, and map accuracy and estimation <br />techniques dictated the estimates may depart from <br />actual elevations by as much as 2.5 feet. <br />In places where water-table surfaces are near the <br />land surface, there is often interest in knowing how <br />close the water-table surface is to the land surface. To <br />show this information, digital elevation models of the <br />generalized water-table map (fig. 2) and the land <br />surface were used to create a depth-to-water map. The <br />digital elevation models provide estimates of either <br />ground-water elevation or land surface elevation for <br />individual grid cells in a gridded network of the study <br />area. Ground-water elevations for individual grid cells <br />were estimated using measurements of ground-water <br /> <br />WATER-TABLE CONDITIONS IN MARCH 1999 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.