Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Fluctuations in Water Levels <br /> <br />The hydrographs in figure 4 are developed from <br />relatively long records in which the wells were <br />measured systematically, usually in the spring and fall <br />of each year, as a minimum. In general, the deepest <br />depths to water are measured in the fall and the shal- <br />lowest in the spring. For a period of time such as used <br />in this study, about 40 years, measurements of ground- <br />water levels in the spring and fall probably do a <br />reasonable job of characterizing the extremes of <br />ground-water level fluctuations. <br />The range in water-level measurements at indi- <br />vidual wells is included in table 3. The mean of the <br />ranges is 6.24 feet. The mean range reported here is <br />nearly twice the mean range reported by Konikow and <br />Bredehoeft in 1974. The difference between these two <br />reported ranges reflects the relatively robust nature of <br />the data used for the study described in this report, <br />which covers a period of decades, compared to the <br />Konikow and Bredehoeft (1974) study for which only <br />I year of data was available. <br />To determine if the measured ranges have a <br />distinctive spatial pattern, they were plotted on a map. <br />The mapped ranges seemed to visually indicate a <br />tendency for ranges to be small near the Arkansas <br />River and to increase away from the river. However, <br />closer examination indicated that although fluctuations <br />greater than 10 feet and sometimes as much as 30 feet <br />commonly occur in areas near the Fort Lyon Canal, <br />relatively large fluctuations of about 10 feet also occur <br />near the Arkansas River and there were no statistically <br />significant relations between geographic setting and <br />the range of water level fluctuation. The magnitude of <br />fluctuations near the river are probably due to occa- <br />sional high flows related to flooding or local effects of <br />ground-water withdrawals, or both. <br /> <br />Short-Term Variation in Water Levels <br /> <br />One question that may arise, especially when a <br />temporal aspect to patterns in water levels has been <br />identified, is "How quickly do water levels change?" <br />Many of the historical water-level records based on <br />spring and fall measurements do not describe potential <br />short-term changes in water levels. The historical <br />records do include some wells that have been <br />measured as frequently as weekly; however, these <br />wells are not located in areas where relatively large <br />fluctuations in water levels have been measured. <br /> <br />Some of the remaining records are in areas <br />where water levels have had relatively large flucma- <br />tions and have been measured monthly or bimonthly <br />for at least some part of the record. These records indi- <br />cate that water levels, in some areas, can change at <br />least as much as I foot per month-a rate that would <br />produce the mean fluctuation in 6 months (table 3). <br />However, water levels could change at rates greater <br />than the rates reported for this study. <br /> <br />The historical records also were evaluated for <br />adequacy in their ability to represent changes in cross- <br />sectional gradients between the Fort Lyon Canal and <br />the Arkansas River. Five roughly north-south cross <br />sections of three to seven wells were identified, and <br />the GWSI data base was accessed to obtain historical <br />water levels along the cross sections that were <br />measured within a reasonably narrow window of time <br />(2 weeks). The results of this evaluation principally <br />indicated that the historical records are not ideal for <br />preparation of cross sections. In almost all cases, water <br />levels were not available for all points in a given cross <br />section. In the few cases when data were sufficient, <br />indications are that gradients along some parts of some <br />cross sections became reversed. That is, for a given set <br />of wells, sometimes the gradient might be towards the <br />river and sometimes the gradient might be away from <br />the river; however, it was not possible to determine if <br />such changes occurred routinely or even if they <br />occurred in the short term. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC FACTORS THAT AFFECT <br />GROUND-WATER LEVELS <br /> <br />Ground-water levels are controlled by recharge <br />to and discharge from the aquifer. In relatively simple <br />systems, recharge may consist only of precipitation, <br />and discharge may consist only of evapotranspiration <br />and ground-water withdrawals made from wells <br />completed in the aquifer. However, there are additional <br />sources of recharge and discharge in the study area <br />that complicate the system. Some of these additional <br />sources, particularly those related to irrigation, repre- <br />sent major changes from a natural setting. The addi- <br />tional sources of recharge and discharge that can be <br />related to hydrologic processes in the study area are <br />referred to as "hydrologic factors" and are discussed in <br />this section. Precipitation and evapotranspiration are <br />not discussed. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC FACTORS THAT AFFECT GROUND.WATER LEVEL.5 15 <br />