Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the)ayton-M:ississippi Detention Pond as pres,ented in the <br />Phas," A report be reexamined.' because of Lhe zoned uses of <br />the proposed site. The need for dei:enticn to handle t:he <br />runo Ef from Drainage Area No. 3 I"dll alsc be used to handle <br />the :~unoff from the RangevieW' art~a, whicl'1 is part of Drainac,e <br />Area No.4. A drainage outlet was provided for the area 10'- <br />cated west of Windsor Lake and south of the Highline Canal <br />(pari: of Drainage ]\,rea No.3). <br /> <br />Low-Plow Channel: Low-flow channels should be providl"d for <br />proposed open channels unless it can be clearly demonstrat:ed <br />that they are not needed. <br /> <br />Main1:enance: Maintenance requirE~ment: s w'ere a primary consider- <br />ation of the preliminary design. Inqress and. eqress for main- <br />tenance, maintenance procedures, equipment needE~d and frequency <br />of maintenance were considered. <br /> <br />Surrum~ <br /> <br />The preliminary design of t.he West:.erly C:ceek drainage and flood <br />control improvements is based on t:,he recommended alternative <br />plan (Alternative No. 3A) of the Phase A report with the a.bove- <br />mentj.oned recommendations a.nd modifica,tions from all juris- <br />dictions. <br /> <br />-6- <br />