My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01653
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01653
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:14:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Larimer County
Stream Name
Big Thompson River
Title
Evaluation of the Flood Hydrology in the Colorado Front Range Using Streamflow Records and Paleoflood Data for the Big Thompson River Basin
Date
5/1/1986
Prepared For
USGS
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The flood magnitudes at these recurrence intervals can be calculated <br /> <br />using only that part of the drainage area below 8,000 feet (2,438 meters). <br /> <br />Using the drainage area below 8,000 feet (2,438 meters) does not imply that <br /> <br />it does not rain above this elevation, but rather that rainfall runoff <br /> <br />above this elevation does not contribute significantly to flood runoff. To <br /> <br />determine the flood characteristics above this elevation requires an <br /> <br />evaluation of snowmelt runoff using methods described by Kircher et al. <br /> <br />(1985). For those sites near the 8,OOO-foot (2,438-meter) elevation level, <br /> <br />flood characteristics may be computed by both methods, and the larger <br /> <br />values used. <br /> <br />The next step in determining flood characteristics at a site depends <br /> <br />on whether the site is ungaged, gaged, or near a gaged site. If the site <br /> <br />is ungaged, then use the values from the regression equations. If the site <br /> <br />is gaged, then the regression results need to be weighted using the site <br /> <br />flood-frequency estimates. The weighting should decrease the time-sampling <br /> <br />error that may occur in a site flood-frequency estimate and should improve <br /> <br />the flood-frequency estimates. This time-sampling error decreases as the <br /> <br />length of record for a site increases. The weighting procedure is des- <br /> <br />cribed by Sauer (1974). The procedure weights the site flood-frequency <br /> <br />estimate and the regression flood-frequency estimate by the years of record <br /> <br />at the site and the equivalent years of record of the regression estimate <br /> <br />using the following equation: <br /> <br />QRt(w) <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />QRt(s) x (N) + QRt(r) x (E) <br />N + E <br /> <br />(8) <br /> <br />.y..r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.