My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01653
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01653
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:14:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Larimer County
Stream Name
Big Thompson River
Title
Evaluation of the Flood Hydrology in the Colorado Front Range Using Streamflow Records and Paleoflood Data for the Big Thompson River Basin
Date
5/1/1986
Prepared For
USGS
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />To model this hypothesis, the contributing drainage area from each <br /> <br /> <br />1,000-foot (305-meter) part of each basin was calculated as shown in Figure <br /> <br /> <br />7 and Table 2. Beginning with the 13,000-foot (3,962-meter) elevation, the <br /> <br /> <br />contributing drainage area below this elevation was calculated and is <br /> <br /> <br />listed in Table 1. Regression analysis was done for each flood magnitude <br /> <br /> <br />against drainage areas below each elevation level. Using the decrease of <br /> <br /> <br />standard error of estimate (average) and the increase in the correlation <br /> <br />coefficient as criteria, the elevation level defining the contributing <br /> <br /> <br />drainage area was selected. The drainage area, mean basin elevation, and <br /> <br /> <br />gage datum were all significant but were so intercorrelated with each other <br /> <br /> <br />that mean basin elevation and gage datum were not used. For each de- <br /> <br /> <br />creasing (or increasing) elevation level, fewer sites were included in the <br /> <br /> <br />regression because the higher (or lower) sites would not have contributing <br /> <br /> <br />drainage area and were not used in the analysis. <br /> <br />Regression analyses were made on three drainage-area characteristics: <br /> <br />total drainage area, drainage area below a stated elevation level, and <br /> <br />drainage area above a stated elevation level. Regression models in the <br /> <br />form: <br /> <br />b <br />QRt = a(A) <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />QRt = rainfall flood magnitude, in cubic feet per second, for the <br /> <br />recurrence interval, t, in years; <br /> <br />a = regression constant; <br /> <br />A = drainage-area characteristic, in square miles; and <br /> <br />b = the regression exponent for the drainage-area characteristic. <br /> <br />.3f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.