My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01653
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01653
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:14:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Larimer County
Stream Name
Big Thompson River
Title
Evaluation of the Flood Hydrology in the Colorado Front Range Using Streamflow Records and Paleoflood Data for the Big Thompson River Basin
Date
5/1/1986
Prepared For
USGS
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Precipitation data <br /> <br />At this elevation and in the vicinity of this site, large rainstorms <br /> <br />occur frequently. Five extreme storms are listed in the report by Miller <br /> <br /> <br />et al. (1984). These storms include the 1938 Spring Canyon, 1938 Missouri <br /> <br /> <br />Canyon near Masonville, 1948 Fort Collins, 1948 Tucker Gulch at Golden, and <br /> <br /> <br />1976 Big Thompson flood, all resulting from intense thunderstorms. <br /> <br />Streamflow data <br /> <br />As stated earlier, lower elevation floods result from intense <br /> <br />rainstorms. The flood-frequency curves for the Big Thompson River at Mouth <br /> <br />of Canyon, near Drake are sho~~ in Figure 5. Rainfall controls the fre- <br /> <br />quency curve for floods greater than the 2-year flood. The contribution <br /> <br />of snowmelt to the flood frequency is small, because the snowmelt generally <br /> <br />only comes from the higher mountains. Although the size of the drainage <br /> <br />area at site 21 is 2.23 times larger than at Estes Park (site 18), the <br />100-year snowmelt flood is only 22 percent larger. The flood of record <br />at site 21 is 31,200 cubic feet per second (883 cubic meters per second), <br />which occurred during the 1976 flash flood. Frequency curves for <br />other lower elevation sites have rainfall curves much higher than the <br /> <br />snowmelt curves. <br /> <br />.3~ <br /> <br />.- ,--- -------- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.