My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01653
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01653
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:14:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Larimer County
Stream Name
Big Thompson River
Title
Evaluation of the Flood Hydrology in the Colorado Front Range Using Streamflow Records and Paleoflood Data for the Big Thompson River Basin
Date
5/1/1986
Prepared For
USGS
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Streamflow data <br /> <br />Streamflow data for the South Platte River basin that were analyzed by <br /> <br /> <br />Jarrett and Costa (1983) are shown in Table 1, Flood-frequency curves <br /> <br /> <br />exist for several streamflow-gaging stations near Estes Park. These curves <br /> <br /> <br />are shown for two sites in Figure 3a and 3b: The Big Thompson River at <br /> <br />Estes Park (site 18) and Little Beaver Creek near Idylwilde (site 25). The <br />separate snowmelt- and rainfall-flood-frequency curves for each site can be <br />combined to construct a composite curve, if the populations are indepen- <br />dent, by using the equation: <br /> <br />P(composite) = P(snowmelt) + P(rainfall) - P(snowmelt) x P(rainfall) (1) <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />P = the exceedance probability of occurrence (Crippen, 1978). <br /> <br />For both sites, the rainfall curve is much lower than the snowmelt and <br /> <br />composite curves, and in neither instance does rainfall contribute to flood <br /> <br />hazards. As elevation increases, the difference between the snowmelt and <br /> <br />rainfall flood-frequency curves increases, The floods of record at the <br /> <br />respective sites are 1,660 cubic feet per second (47.0 cubic meters per <br /> <br /> <br />second) and 28 cubic feet per second (0,79 cubic meters per second). Both <br /> <br /> <br />floods resulted from snowmelt runoff. The maximum rainfall floods at these <br /> <br /> <br />respective sites were 871 and 6.7 cubic feet per second (24.7 and 0.19 <br /> <br /> <br />cubic meters per second). <br /> <br />~o <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.