Laserfiche WebLink
<br />system net benefits subject to accomplishment of performance targets. The <br />system is described by hydrologic data, component performance, and cost <br />functions and flow damage information for damage centers. The system compo- <br />nents that may be sized include detention storage reservoirs, pumping, and <br />diversion facilitieS. Initial applications suggest that the technique has considerable <br />value in urban flood-control plan formulation and evaluation studies. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />The technique described herein was developed at the Hydrologic Engineering <br />Center, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Davis, Calif., by the writer <br />at the request of the United States Army Engineer District, St. Louis, Mo. <br />The sponsorship, encouragement, and support of James Dexter of the Urban <br />Studies Section, St. Louis District, was instrumental in the development of <br />the technique. <br /> <br />ApPENDIX I.-REFERENCES <br /> <br />I. Arvanitidis, N. V.. et aI., "A Computer Simulation Model for Rood Plain Development, <br />Part I: Land Use Planning and Benefit Evaluation," IWR Report 72-1, Institute for <br />Water Resources, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, Va., Feb., <br />1972. <br />2. Beard, L. R., "Optimization Techniques for Hydrologic Engineering," Hydrologic <br />Engineering Center Technical Paper No.2, Davis, Calif., Apr., 1%6. <br />3. Cline, J. N., "Planning Rood Control Measures by Digital Computers," University <br />of Kentucky Water Resources Institute, Lexington, Ky., 1%8. <br />4. Davis, D. W., "Rood Control System Component Optimization-HEC-I Capability," <br />Training Document (Draft), The Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, Calif., Oct., <br />1974. <br />5. Day, J. c., and Weisz, R. N., "A Methodology for Planning Land Use and Engineering <br />Alternatives for Rood Plain Management," IWR Paper 74-P2, Institute for Water <br />Resources, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, Va., Apr., 1974. <br />6. HEC-I Flood Hydrograph Users Manual, The Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, <br />Calif., Jan., ]973. <br />7. Jacoby and Loucks, "Combined Use of Optimization and Simulation Models in River <br />Basin Planning," Water Resources Research, Vol. 8, 1972, pp. 140]-]413. <br />8. James, L. D., "Nonstructural Measures for Rood Control," Water Resources Research, <br />Vol. I, 1%5, pp. 9-24. <br />9. James, L. D., "Economic Analysis of Alternative Rood Control Measures," Water <br />Resources Research, Vol. 3, ]%7, pp. 333-343. <br /> <br />APPENDIX II,-NOTATION <br /> <br />The following symbols are used in this paper: <br /> <br />, <br />p <br /> <br />A <br />AD. <br />J <br />a <br />C <br />, <br />CNST <br />DEV <br />EXP <br />f(X) = <br /> <br />= normalizing constant; <br />= location expected annual damage; <br />= outlet flow area; <br />= component equivalent annual cost; <br />= weighting constant; <br />= difference between target and simulated flow; <br />= exponent for tailwater conditions; <br />magnitude of objective function; <br /> <br />" <br />