Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />!I <br />I <br />1- <br /> <br />and ground cover, and defines the shape of the runoff hydrograph <br />for one inch of direct runoff over the area. For storms where <br />the effective precipitation depth is different from the unit <br />depth, the actual storm hydrograph is determined by multiplying <br />the ordinates of the unit hydrograph by the effective precipita- <br />tion depth and adding to obtain the final storm runoff hydrograph. <br /> <br />To facilitate accuracy and standardization in developing input <br />for the effective precipitation, unit hydrograph and storm hydro- <br />graph operations of the model, a HYDRO data sheet was developed, <br />as shown in Figure III-I. The input sheet provides the basin <br />name and number, which is used primarily for computer identifi- <br />cation, and also the design point of interest. The section, <br />township and range of the particular design point was also in- <br />cluded to assist in the determination of the storm rainfall <br />depths. Basin parameters were determined from the mapping <br />available. These parameters included the area, channel length, <br />channel length closest to the basin centroid and the average <br />channel slope through the basin. In addition, flow times along <br />the channel through the basin were computed using a predetermined <br />design velocity. The degree and type of development within the <br />basin was noted. When the type of development was quite irregular, <br />the areas of different development were noted to assist in deter- <br />mination of various basin characteristics. Basin or hydrological <br />characteristics included the percentage of pervious and impervious <br />areas, a constant infiltration rate in inches per hour, pervious <br />and impervious retention depths, the impervious loss percentage, <br />and hydrograph time and peak coefficients reflecting the type <br />and degree of development. At the bottom of the input sheet <br />the storm rainfall depths were recorded for the 2, 10 and 100 <br />year frequencies and the 1 and 6 hour durations. These condi- <br />tions encompassed the range of frequencies and duration of <br />interest in the study. Additional comments concerning the basin <br />were noted at the bottom of the sheet. <br /> <br />The storm hydrograph coefficients, Cp and Ct' which reflect the basin <br /> <br />slope and degree of perviousness or imperviousness, and degree of <br />sewered area, are based on the values recommended in the Urban <br />Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. <br /> <br />An additional variable in the computation of the unit hydrograph <br />within the HYDRO model is the unit hydrograph width relationships <br />at the 50% and 75% peak flow points. For the Sanderson and Weir <br />studies the most recent width relationship developed by the Urban <br />Drainage and Flood Control District were used which reflect <br />characteristic widths of unit hydrographs in developed urban <br />areas. <br /> <br />-22- <br />