Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />i;~ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~ ": <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A tyoical input data sheet for the reservoir routing program <br />is shown in Figure 111-2. The objective of this input sheet <br />is to provide a description of the reservoir and the outlet <br />control section as well as the methods used in determining <br />the stage-volume-discharge curves which are characteristic <br />of the reservoir and spillway. For the most part, volumes <br />for the reservoirs were determined from the topographic maps <br />which were available. In nearly every case the normal water <br />surface of the reservoir was assumed to be at the spillway <br />elevation. Spillway overflow and berm overtopping were <br />computed utilizing the basic broad crested weir formula. <br /> <br />No input data sheets were made for the lagging and adding <br />program. Once the input data was established for all phases <br />of the HYDRO model, the information was transferred to <br />computer coding sheets from which the input cards were <br />punched and run. A sample computer output from the HYDRO <br />model is shown in Figure 111-3. <br /> <br />DESIGN RAINFALL <br /> <br />The design rainfall for the study area was taken from isohyetal <br />maps in the Rainfall Section of the Urban Storm Drainaqe Criteria <br />Manual. These maps provide the rainfall depths for the 2, 10, <br />and 100 year frequencies and 1, 6 and 24 hour storm durations. <br />Since the gulches extended approximately nine miles from the <br />South Platte River, the storm rainfa~l typical to each sub- <br />basin was used, rather than assuming the same design <br />storm over the total basin. <br /> <br />From the storm rainfall input, the effective precipitation was <br />computed following the procedure presented in the Runoff <br />Section of the Manual. The effective precipitation is a <br />function of the degree of impervious and pervious area, sur- <br />face detention and depression storage, infiltration, vegeta- <br />tion interception and an impervious area loss percentage. <br /> <br />The determination of these abstraction coefficients was based <br />on an analysis of the recorded rainfall and runoff hydrograph <br />on Harvard Gulch at Logan Street for the storm of June 8, 1969. <br />In order to reproduce the storm hydrograph, the rainfall ab- <br />stractions were manipulated to give the required excess pre- <br />cipitation. A review of the data indicated an infiltration <br />rate for this event which varied from 1-1/2 inches per hour <br />in the earlier part of the storm to less than 1/2 inch per hour <br />toward the end of the storm. The pervious detention-depression <br />storage for that storm was about 0.80 inches while the impervious <br />storage was 0.30 inches with a 15% loss factor. These values <br />were comparatively high yet relatively realistic. Comparing <br /> <br />-24- <br />