Laserfiche WebLink
<br />were obtained in less than a wee:k. In comparison, the HEC-2 <br />analysis took more than a month to finish. <br /> <br />FIGURE 10 HEC-2 AND FLO.2D PREDICTED <br />FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARIES FOR THE <br />POUDRE RIVER NEAR <br />FORT COLLINS, CO, I'r~ <br /> <br /> <br />FLO-2D Delineoted 100-Ye., F1eed Boundory J/ , <br />HEC'2 D,lin,ot,d 100-Y,., F1oo<1 8u ~ ~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />/- <br /> <br />/~ <br />_-r- <br /> <br />\ ,",-... " <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~_ Poudre RIver <br /> <br />9 HEC-2 Zero inundatIOn Area <br /> <br />za Fl,o-2D Zero Inundation Area <br /> <br />lnlerslale 25 <br /> <br />~ 7 <br /> <br />- Representative Grid Elemenl F-~ <br />L -- GRAPHIC SCAlJ: <br />'1"7 "... ~ <br />- /r ,~..-<._, <br />L ._*_... <br /> <br />H1~C -2 Delineated toO-Year nood Boundal'Y <br /> <br />FLO-2D Delineated lOO-Yeor Flood Boundary <br /> <br />6.3 Verification of Mudflow Hydraulics <br /> <br />The simulation of hyperconcen'l:ra1:ed sediment flows with the <br />FLO-2D model was verified using field data from the 1983 Rudd Creek <br />mudflows in Davis county, Utah. ThE! Rudd Creek data is the best <br />available field data in the literature. The flood hydrograph and <br />data used in the simulation were developed by the Army Corps of <br />Engineers (USCOE, 1988). The field data to be replicated included: <br /> <br />(1) The area of inundation indi.cated on aerial photography; <br /> <br />(2) A surveyed volume of the mudflow deposit of approximately <br />84,000 yd'; <br /> <br />(3) A mudflow frontal velocity on the alluvial fan of <br />approximately the speed t:hat a man could walk (eyewi.tness <br />account) ; <br /> <br />(4) Observed mudflow depths that ranged from approximately 12 <br />feet at the apex of the alluvial fan to approximately 2 <br />or 3 feet at the debris front. <br /> <br />Using the COE hydrograph (Fig. 11), the area of inundation <br />could be reproduced almost exactly (Fig. 12). The maximum computed <br /> <br />28 <br />