My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01615
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:13 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:09:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
258
County
Arapahoe
Community
Littleton
Stream Name
Big Dry Creek
Title
Flood Insurance Study - City of Littleton
Date
6/1/1978
Prepared For
Littleton
Prepared By
FIA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3.2 Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of streams in <br />the community were carried out' to provide estimates of the <br />elevations of floods of the se.lected recurrence intervals <br />along each stream studied in the community. <br /> <br />Water-surface elevations of floods of the selected <br />recurrence intervals were computed through use of the <br />U. S. Army Corps of Engineers .HEC-2 step-backwater <br />computer program (Reference 12). Starting elevations <br />for the tributaries to the South Platte River were taken <br />from the flood profile elevation of the corresponding <br />flood frequency on the South Platte River. In many cases, <br />this control elevation shifted upstream to bridges or <br />culverts along Santa Fe Drive and/or the parallel rail- <br />road structures. . <br /> <br />Lee Gulch and Little Creek cross sections were field- <br />surveyed and were located at close intervals above and <br />below bridges and culverts in order to compute the <br />effects of backwater. For Big Dry Creek and Slaughter- <br />house Gulch, cross sections Were taken from detailed <br />topographic maps (References 4 and 13). Detailed mapping <br />of the South Platte was secured from the U. S. Army Corps <br />of Engineers. The U. S. Geological Survey topographic <br />mapping at a scale of 1:24,000, with a contour interval <br />of 10 feet, was used with the 'field survey data (Refer- <br />ence 14). <br /> <br />Locations of selected cross sections used in the hydraulic <br />computations are shown on the Floodway Maps (Exhibit 2). <br />Channel roughness factors (Manning's On") for these <br />computations were assigned on the basis of field inspec- <br />tion of the flood plain areas ,and engineering judgment. <br />Likewise, bridge and culvert qoefficients used in <br />computations were assigned on:the basis of field inspec- <br />tions of structures and engin4ering judgment. <br /> <br />Flood Profiles were drawn showing computed water-surface <br />elevations to an accuracy of 0.5 foot for floods of the <br />selected recurrence intervals (Exhibit 1). <br /> <br />All elevations are referenced'to the National Geodetic <br />Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD). Elevation reference <br />marks used in the study are s~own on the maps. <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses completed in this study did not <br />account for probable debris blockage of bridges and <br />culverts. The potential for blockage exists, and plan- <br />ning in or near the flood plain should recognize the <br />limitation of this data if structures become inoperable <br />and fail. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.