Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CENTRAL CITY MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />meets the face of the improved inlet. Depending on survey for <br />final design, there may be an opportunity to install a drop and <br />tapered inlet which may provide additional hydraulic benefits. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4.4 <br /> <br />Other Eureka Gulch Locations <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4.4.1 <br /> <br />Gregory Gulch/Lawrence Street Cribbing <br /> <br />Existing cribbing supporting channel banks east of downtown is <br />failing (Figure 4.1.4). Flood flows will further damage the <br />cribbing resulting in damage to surrounding property and Lawrence <br />Street. Standard Colorado Department of Highways steel cribbing <br />is recommended at this location. <br /> <br />4.4.2 <br /> <br />MacFarlane Foundry Flume <br /> <br />The capacity of the existing flume underneath the MacFarlane <br />Foundry (Figure 4.1.2) is insignificant compared to flood <br />discharges on Eureka Gulch. Street flows at MacFarlane Foundry <br />resul t in damage to property as water returns to the channel. <br />Capacity of the Opera House flume improved inlet was used as <br />design capacity of the culvert under MacFarlane Foundry. <br /> <br />The existing flume may be classified as a historical structure. <br />It bccupies the "better" hydraulic alignment for a drainage <br />structure beneath the foundry. The new culvert can be installed <br />parallel to the existing flume to preserve it. The new culvert <br />will be either jacked under the foundry or the foundry will be <br />supported and a culvert placed underneath. <br /> <br />4.4.3 <br /> <br />Prosser Loop pipes <br /> <br />Both the upper and lower Prosser Loops crossings (Figures 4.1.1 <br />and 4.1.2) have less than 10-year flood capacity. When <br />overtopping occurs, local flooding and debris and sediment <br />deposition occurs. Increasing pipe size and improving inlet <br />conditions will decrease the frequency of these problems. <br /> <br />4,.4.4 <br /> <br />Rehabilitate Opera House Flume <br /> <br />.' <br />~ <br /> <br />The Opera House flume (Figures 4.1.2 and 4.1.3) consists of a <br />series of metal pipes, masonry tunnels and concrete pipe. It is <br />also has historical significance being primarily constructed in <br />the 1870's. Increasing the capacity of the flume inlet will <br />cause additional stress to the flume lining. Masonry tuck <br />pointing, reinforcing joints and installing flash boards at <br />potential overflow locations will improve'the hydraulic capacity <br />as well as the historical integrity of the flume. <br /> <br />4.4.5 <br /> <br />Tree and Debris Removal <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Eureka Gulch channel upstrea~'of <br />overgrown with phreatophytic growth. <br />channel reduce channel capacity and <br />debris clogging of flume and culvert <br /> <br />the Opera House flume is <br />Willows and aspen in the <br />raise the potential for <br />inlets. Selective tree <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />HydroDynamics Incorporated <br />