Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CENTRAL CITY MASTER DRAINAGE STUDY <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />SECTION 4. EUREKA GULCH DRAINAGE <br /> <br />4.1 General <br /> <br />There are two efforts to reduce drainage and sediment damage, and <br />maintenance requirements on Eureka Gulch. The first is major <br />drainage improvements to convey storm waters and sediment <br />collected in the watershed above the City. The second is to <br />improve local drainage for frequent events such as snowmelt and <br />normal summer rain showers. <br /> <br />4.1.1 <br /> <br />Major Drainage <br /> <br />Eureka Gulch flows through several drainage structures along its <br />path from the west city limit to its confluence with Nevada <br />Gulch. A field review indicated that critical locations include <br />Prosser Loop pipes (Figure 4.1.1 and 4.1.2), MacFarlane Foundry <br />flume (Figure 4.1.2) and the entrance to the flume at the west <br />edge of the Opera Association parking lot (referred to herein as <br />the the Opera House flume, Figure 4.1.2). <br /> <br />.overtopping floods occur at the Opera House flume for the 2.6- <br />year flood using information in CWCB (1987). Flood flows that <br />exceed the capacity of the flume flow east onto the parking lot, <br />down to the Opera House where they pond until they spill to the <br />north onto Eureka Street and to the south behind the Opera House. <br /> <br />Local experience would dispute that the frequency of flume <br />overtopping and street flooding is every other year. CWCB <br />hydrology is compatible with the Black Hawk study. Flume <br />hydraul ics are, perhaps, too conservative. However, with the <br />abundance of debris along the channel and sediment sources, it is <br />possible that a two-year flood could be responsible for <br />overtopping the flume. <br /> <br />T,herefore, the object of the conceptual design for Eureka Gulch <br />is to make the occurrence of street flooding less frequent. <br />Street flooding, once it occurs, greatly increases the flooded <br />a~ea and the property at risk since water does not return to the <br />channel until it flows through the downtown area. <br /> <br />From an analytical standpoint, damage due to overtopping the <br />flume and subsequent street flooding and damage has a 38 percent <br />chance of occurring each year. If this can be reduced to the 13- <br />year event, or a 7.5 percent chance of damage, then the risk <br />associated with street flooding, on an annualized basis, will be <br />greatly reduced (with risk measured in dollars of damage). Other <br />elements of risk assessment such as loss of life and loss of <br />business revenue will also be favorably affected. <br /> <br />Two opportunities are available, for decreasing the overtopping <br />frequency, they are detention stdrage and increased Opera House <br />flume capacity. The City owns a detention storage location at <br />Dorothy Lee placer site (Figure 1.1.1). A 9.9 foot high, non- <br />jurisdictional dam at approximately the location of the existing <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />HydroDynamics Incorporated <br />