Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Section 4 describes the criteria used by the CWCB to evaluate mitigation alternatives for <br />addressing the flood risk at the 8 ponds. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Section 5 list specific flood information for each pond along with a mitigation analysis <br />for that pond. Section 5 includes 6 Site Reports for the 6 pond sites (the 2 Connected <br />Lakes and Duke Lake are all included in the same Site Report). For each site report there <br />are four subsections. <br /> <br />Subsection 5.1 includes aerial photos from 1983, 1984 and/or 1993 to show what <br />effect the river had on the ponds in those high flow events. <br /> <br />Subsection 5.2 describes field surveys conducted in January 1995 at each site by <br />CWCB staff. It also describes the sources of hydraulic information for evaluating <br />the flood risk at each site. Supporting information attached to Subsection 5.2 <br />includes profile sheets with existing ground elevations compared to IOO-year flood <br />elevations and floodplain maps. <br /> <br />Subsection 5.3 describe the specific flood risk at each site in terms of flood <br />depths and risk of erosion damage, <br /> <br />Subsection 5.4 offers some preliminary recommendations for mitigation of the <br />flood problems at each site. <br /> <br />3 <br />