My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01533
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01533
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:09:17 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:05:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Stream Name
Colorado River
Title
Colorado River Flood Risk Analyses
Date
1/1/1995
Prepared For
Colorado Division of Wildlife
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado River, so non-native fish could easily enter the Colorado River. In addition to the <br />likelihood of floodwaters entering the three lakes, there are clear signs that bank erosion is a <br />major concern at Duke Lake and Connected Lakes. The site has historically been a part of the <br />Colorado River floodplain and it has experience substantial channel migration in the past. Bank <br />protection measures undertaken by Mesa ~ounty since 1984 have themselves experienced erosion <br />damage, The dikes that were constructed since 1984 as part of the park improvements do not <br />appear to have been designed to withstand erosion from a 50-year or a 100-year flood. While, <br />some sections of the levee are above the 100-year flood elevation and provide an aesthetically <br />pleasing place to walk or fish, they do not provide 50-year or 100-year flood protection. In <br />addition, they were not designed with higher velocities or higher flood stages resulting from <br />floodplain constriction in mind. The levee would not experience overtopping during a 10-year <br />flood, but there would be streambank erosion if no additional bank protection were installed, <br /> <br />Subsection 5.4 <br /> <br />Mitieation Analvsis <br /> <br />Even with the substantial work that has been done at the state park, at the residential areas within <br />the Connected Lakes subdivision and at the Pepsi-Cola Plant since 1984, there is additional work <br />that would have to be done to provide 50-year and 100-year flood protection. The levee system <br />would need to be raised to keep Duke Lake (and, therefore, Connected Lakes) out of the 50-year <br />floodplain. That levee and the existing dike around the remainder of the site would clearly <br />require erosion and slope protection. The erosion protection would need to be engineered to <br />mimimize the risk of undermining by a flood. There would need to be additional freeboard in <br />some locations. Before such mitigation measures were undertaken, an engineering analysis would <br />be needed. A 50-year flood protection project may be feasible for the stream reach from the <br />Redlands Parkway upstream to Highway 340. <br /> <br />13.3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.