My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01529
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01529
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:58:16 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:05:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Big Thompson Canyon
Stream Name
Big Thompson
Title
Natural Disaster Survey Report 76-1: Big Thompson Canyon Flash Flood of July 31 - August 1, 1976
Date
10/1/1976
Prepared For
Department of Commerce
Prepared By
NOAA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />O1APTER 3 <br /> <br />METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS AND FORECASTS <br /> <br />During the past 25 years meteorologists have come to recognize that <br />important atmospheric processes occur over a wide spectrum of interacting <br />scales. The conditions contributing to the Big Thompson Canyon flash <br />flood were no exception--large or synoptic scale conditions for substantial <br />convective activity were present, but all data from radars, satellites, <br />and surface observations indicate that small or meso-scale features, several <br />hundred kilometers or less in size, were significant factors in triggering <br />the very heavy rainfall. Unfortunately, there are substantial gaps in <br />our knowledge and understanding of meso-scale meteorology. <br /> <br />Synoptic Scale Features <br /> <br />A nearly stationary upper atmospheric high pressure ridge with very light <br />winds had persisted over Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, and Colorado for <br />several days prior to the flood. Moisture at the 500 mb (50 kPa) level, <br />about 6 kilometers above sea level, had been high over Colorado since <br />6:00 a.m. on July 29. Relative humidities from the surface to 500 mb had <br />remained well below 50% over Colorado until 6:00 a.m. on July 31, when <br />Grand Junction and Denver reported values of 68% and 82% respectively. <br />Precipitable water values (another measure of atmospheric moisture) gradually <br />doubled from just above one-half inch at 6:00 a.m. on July 29, to slightly <br />more than one inch at 6:00 a.m. on July 31. This increase was unusual but <br />not unprecedented for summer months. Lifted index values, showing <br />atmospheric stability, had remained near zero throughout the period, <br />indicating that the air mass was conditionally unstable and that thunder- <br />storms would occur if deep convection were initiated by afternoon heating <br />or orographic lifting. <br /> <br />During the 36-hour period preceding the flood, low level moisture began to <br />concentrate in a zone about 200 miles (320 km) wide on the north side of the <br />cold front and advect westward from the central plains. Surface dew points <br />in central Colorado were generally in the 40's at 6:00 a,m. on July 30. <br />These near-normal values had risen into the 50's 24 hours later. Dew points <br />in northeastern Colorado rose from the 50's into the 60's during the same <br />period. The rise in dew point values was greatest in Colorado, western <br />Kansas, southeastern Wyoming, and eastern Utah. By 6:00 a.m. on July 31, <br />surface dew point values in eastern Colorado were 10 to 150F above July- <br />August normals. <br /> <br />Surface pressures rose in the northern plains, moving a weak cold front <br />slowly southward through the central plains. By 6:00 a.m. on July 31, the <br />front extended from north-central Illinois across central Missouri into <br />western Kansas and eastern Colorado. Easterly winds in the lower levels <br />on the north side of the front continued to blow upslope toward the Front <br />Range of the Ro~ky Mountains. <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.