My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD01459
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
FLOOD01459
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 1:07:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 10:03:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Gunnison
Community
Uncompahgre Valley
Title
Upper Gunnison-Uncompahgre Basin Phase 1 Feasibility Study Summary Report
Date
5/1/1989
Prepared For
Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority
Prepared By
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3-8 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />intended to be maintained primarily by releases from Green Mountain and Ruedi <br />Reservoirs. Blue Mesa Reservoir is being discussed as an additional source of <br />water if the supply from the other reservoirs is insufficient. The instream <br />flow requirement at Westwater is still under study. It was therefore <br />considered premature to model releases from Blue Mesa Reservoir for this <br />purpose and this potential demand on Gunnison Basin water was not modeled. <br /> <br />3.6 TREATMENT OF CONDITIONAL WATER RIGHTS DECREES <br /> <br />A large number of conditional water rights decrees have been adjudicated <br />in the Gunnison Basin. It is reasonable to assume that some of these decrees <br />wi 11 be perfected to some degree in the future, but that others wi 11 not. <br />Based on the future water demand forecasts developed during the study, on <br />di scussions with members of the Technical Steering and Advi sory Committees, <br />and on professional judgement, a list of conditional decrees to be included in <br />the model was developed. Omission of conditional water rights from the list <br />carries no legal implication regarding those rights. In fact, there are many <br />reasons why a water supplier might legitimately maintain diligence on <br />condit i ona 1 water rights in amounts greater than i ncl uded in thi s study's <br />model. These reasons include but are not limited to the following: <br /> <br />o The water suppl ier may not have confidence in the reliabil ity or <br />longevity of its present water supply system and may be considering <br />the implementation of a new type of system. Furthermore, it may be <br />difficult to obtain changes in its present decrees to support the <br />new system. An example would be the conversion of a groundwater <br />system that is presently experiencing water quality or water table <br />drawdown problems to a surface water storage system. <br /> <br />o The water supp 1 i er could have condit i onal decrees that may prove <br />difficult to perfect in their present form but the possibil ity of <br />transferring them to some other project, other uses, or other <br />purpose may be feasible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.