Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />!I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />:1 <br />II <br />I <br />'il <br />i <br />il <br />I- <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I . <br />11 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />./ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />H 0 R <br /> <br />HDR Engineering. Inc. <br /> <br />Suite 300 <br />303 East 17th Avenue <br />Denver, Colorado <br />80203.1256 <br /> <br />Telephone: <br />303 861.1300 <br /> <br />Mr. Uli Kappus, P.E., Executive Director <br />Colorado Water Resources and <br />Power Development Authority <br />1580 Logan Street, Suite 620 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br /> <br />Re: Summary Report for the Upper <br />Gunnison-Uncompahgre Basin <br />Phase 1 Feasibility Study <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Kappus: <br /> <br />We are pleased to submit this Summary Report as required by our <br />contract dated June 5, 1987. Five interim Task Memoranda have been <br />submitted previously, each reporting in detail on certain aspects of <br />the study. A Final Report which discusses the study in a more <br />detailed manner is submitted under separate cover. <br /> <br />The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate water <br />resource management plans to enhance the water-based economy of the <br />Study Area in an environmentally sound manner, Both structural and <br />non-structural components have been examined, evaluated and utilized <br />to formulate alternative plans which would meet in-basin needs. A <br />recommended plan has been identified which meets the study objective. <br /> <br />Non-structural measures related to the municipal and industrial <br />sector were found to have 1 ittle potential for saving water in the <br />context of this basin-wide study because the total consumptive use in <br />this sector is less than two percent of the total consumptive use in <br />the entire study area at present. Some of the measures ident ifi ed <br />should be considered for implementation at the local level in the <br />future, however, Non-structural measures identified in the <br />agricultural sector were determined to be either technically or <br />economically infeasible except for water rights exchanges and/or <br />transfers and drought leasing, <br /> <br />Six alternative development plans were evaluated as a means of <br />meeting future water demands and enhancing water-based recreation in <br />the Study Area. The preferred pl an cons i sts of the fo 11 owi ng: a <br />20,000 acre-foot multipurpose reservoir in the Ohio Creek basin; a <br />25,000 acre-foot multipurpose storage reservoir in the Tomichi Creek <br />basin; and ten recreation enhancement components. The total capital <br />cost of this plan is approximately $55 mill ion (January 1989 price <br />level). <br />