Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The analysis was performed on a reach-by-reach basis. The results are <br /> <br /> <br />presented as benefit-cost ratios and net benefits for each reach for each <br /> <br /> <br />improvement plan. The range of the benefit-cost ratio was from 0.04 to 0.85. <br /> <br /> <br />All ratios are less than one since there is little existing damage potential <br /> <br /> <br />to economically justify the cost of improvements. The average benefit-cost <br /> <br /> <br />ratio for Alternative 2 was 0.10 as compared to 0.45 for Alternative 3 and <br /> <br /> <br />0.38 for Alternative 4. These ratios differ from the range of ratios because <br /> <br />all benefits and costs are considered to affect the entire basin whereas on a <br /> <br /> <br />reach-by-reach basis only cost and benefits for each reach are considered. <br /> <br /> <br />Total costs for Alternatives 2, 3 and 4 are $21,117,900, $3,355,300, and <br /> <br /> <br />$3,814,300 for the 100-year design flow. Total annual cost is $1,632,200 for <br /> <br /> <br />Alternative 2, $276,900 for Alternative 3, and $316,100 for Alternative 4. <br /> <br /> <br />The annual costs are based on a 50-year life and a discount rate of 7-3/8 per- <br /> <br /> <br />cent. The discount rate is from federal guidelines. Alternative 3 was the <br /> <br /> <br />selected improvement plan based on the highest benefit cost ratio. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />stability Analysis of Channel Banks <br /> <br /> <br />A stability analysis was performed to evaluate bank stability and deter- <br /> <br /> <br />mine equilibrium slopes for existing and developed hydrology and hydrology <br /> <br /> <br />corresponding to the selected improvement plan. Bank stability along Fossil <br /> <br /> <br />Creek and the tributaries ranged from extremely stable to ~xtremely unstable. <br /> <br /> <br />Unstable banks were generally on the outside of meander bends. Major bank <br /> <br /> <br />instability problems are produced by general degradation of the streambed. <br /> <br /> <br />The equi1ibriunl slope analysis determined aggradation and/or degradation <br /> <br /> <br />potential of reaches along the channel syste~ for three flow regimes. <br /> <br /> <br />Recommended improvements to limit degradation and stabilize banks in these <br /> <br /> <br />reaches were based on the flow regime corresponding to Alternative 3. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Plan Formulation <br /> <br /> <br />The selected improvement plan was based on enlarging culverts and main- <br /> <br /> <br />taining three feet of freeboard behind embankments which pond water. The <br /> <br /> <br />suggested improvements are guidelines for the local communities. The improve- <br /> <br /> <br />ments are based on the 100-year flood frequency for developed conditions. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />vii <br /> <br />The plan calls for a vegetated channel from Fossil Creek Reservoir to the <br /> <br />Union Pacific Railroad. The crossing at Timberline Road (County Road 11) <br /> <br /> <br />should be enlarged. A headWall should be placed at the upstream end of the <br /> <br /> <br />Union Pacific Railroad. The road at Trilby Road (County Road 34) should be <br /> <br /> <br />raised and the culvert enlarged. The channel crossing at Lemay Avenue (County <br /> <br /> <br />Road 13) should be enlarged. The reach between Mail Creek and the Colorado & <br /> <br /> <br />Southern Railroad requires riprap along the south bank near Portner Reservoir <br /> <br /> <br />in order to stabilize the bank. The upstream wingwa11 on the south side of <br /> <br /> <br />the C&S Railroad should be stabilized. It appears to be failing due to <br /> <br /> <br />embankment sloughing. The downstream embankment at Fossil Creek Drive should <br /> <br /> <br />be adequately protected to handle one foot of overtopping. Currently there is <br /> <br /> <br />downstream protection and the stability during a 100-year storm should be <br /> <br /> <br />checked. The channel crossing at Shields Street should be enlarged to prevent <br /> <br /> <br />overtopping. The channel at the downstream side of all culverts and channel <br /> <br />crossings should be riprapped. <br /> <br /> <br />Also, based on the proposed improvements, the equilibrium slope analysis <br /> <br />determined locations for erosion control structures along Fossil Creek. Five- <br /> <br /> <br />feet of degradation should be allowed for downstream of Lemay Avenue (County <br /> <br /> <br />Road 13). The reach upstream of Lemay Avenue will degrade slightly but will <br /> <br /> <br />stabilize due to the aggradation occurring in the reach upstream of the Mail <br /> <br />Creek confluence. Between Highway 287 and the C&S Railroad about 8.7 feet of <br /> <br /> <br />degradation is expected due to high velocities. Two erosion control struc- <br /> <br /> <br />tures located at the railroad crossing and the center of this channel length <br /> <br /> <br />are recommended. Another Fossil Creek channel reach that will tend to degrade <br /> <br />is between the Burns Tributary Confluence and Shields Street. Here, an ero- <br /> <br /> <br />sion control structure that allows for three feet of degradation should be <br /> <br /> <br />placed at the center portion of the reach and another 3.3 feet of degradation <br /> <br />should be allowed at Shields Street. <br /> <br /> <br />Slight aggradation is expected along Smith Creek and Burns Tributary to <br /> <br /> <br />achieve an equilibrium slope and no improvements are recommended. Both <br /> <br /> <br />Stanton Creek and Lang Gulch require improvement to limit degradation. <br />