Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />III. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />SJCD (South) - Basin 6200 <br /> <br />The drainageways were divided into thirteen separate sub-basins which are <br />shown on Sheet 1. Flood hydrographs were developed for each sub-basin for <br />the 2, 5, 10, 50 and 100 year floods for the future basin development con- <br />dition.and for the 100 year flood for the existing condition. Hydrologic <br />parameters including tributary area, basin length, length to centroid, and <br />basin slope were measured from U. S. G. S. quadrangle maps, and detailed topo- <br />graphic mapping provided by the UDFCb. Estimates of existing and projected <br />impervious areas were made from analysis of a~rial photographs, inspection of <br />other developed areas in the Denver Metropolitan area, and through data rela- <br />ting density of development to impervious area for Denver and other areas of <br />the country. All hydrologic information concerning the North Tributary of <br />SJCb (South) - Basin 6200 was taken from a major drainageway planning study <br />prepared by CH2M-Hill, Inc. for the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, <br />Jefferson County and Arapahoe County in July 1976 (1). <br /> <br />At the Nevada Ditch, SJCD (South) - Basin 6200 drains approximately 4.0 square <br /> <br /> <br />miles. There are three branches including the North Tributary and Tributaries <br /> <br /> <br />1 and 2. The North Tributary will become tributary to SJCD (South) - Basin 6200 <br /> <br /> <br />when drainage improvements are constructed in accordance with the North Tribu- <br /> <br />tary's Master Plan (1) (July 1976). This future condition was included in this <br /> <br /> <br />analysis. Below the Nevada Ditch, gravel is being mined and no definable drain- <br /> <br /> <br />age outlet to the South Platte River exists. The lower portion of the basin <br /> <br /> <br />is in Arapahoe County, while the major portion is in Jefferson County. The up- <br /> <br /> <br />stream limit of study extends to an elevation of 5770 feet. Main channel slopes <br /> <br /> <br />throughout the re~ch average 1.5%. SJCb (South) Tributary No. 1 joins the main <br /> <br /> <br />branch at a point below South Wadsworth Boulevard. It drains an area of 0.7 <br /> <br /> <br />square miles, passes through the existing Fairview Heights subdivision and has <br /> <br /> <br />an average channel slope of 2.2%. Tributary No.2 joins SJCD (South) at a point <br /> <br /> <br />near Ken Caryl Road. It drains an area of 0.2 square miles with an average <br /> <br />channel slope of 1.9%. <br /> <br />For all sub-basins east of the Hogback Ridge, the Colorado Urban Hydrograph <br />Procedure (CUHP) was utilized. The procedure is described in the urban Storm <br />Drainaqe Criteria Manual (4) published in 1969. The UDFCD issued an interim pro- <br />cedure for determining the unit hydrograph coefficients c and c as functions <br />t p <br />of basin slope and impervious area. It is described in their June, 1977 issue <br />of "Flood Hazard News" (5), and was used to define the unit hyd:iograph coefficients <br />in this study. For the upper basin of Massey Draw (Sub-basin. F), another syn- <br />thetic hydrograph procedure called SYNHYD was utilized. It was developed <br />specifically by LRCWE for application to non-urban basins. It is based on <br />Snyder's synthetic hydrograph method and differs from the CUHP in the compu- <br />tation of the time to peak, inclusion of basin slope as a variable, definition <br />of c and c coefficients, and the Shape of the unit hydrograph. A descrip- <br />t p <br />tion of the program is included in the hydrologic backup data for this study <br />which is on file with the UDFCD. Basin parameters and summarized on Table III-I. <br /> <br />Basin Development <br /> <br />Existing development was determined through analysis of aerial photographs and <br /> <br /> <br />base maps provided by Jefferson County, and by field inspection. Future develop- <br /> <br /> <br />ment was projected with the aid of a map titled, "Southeast Jefferson County <br /> <br /> <br />Development" provided by the Jefferson County Planning Department, and through <br /> <br /> <br />discussions with Jefferson County Planning and Engineering personnel. In addition, <br /> <br /> <br />a number of development plats were obtained and reviewed. <br /> <br />Design rainfall was taken from the publication, "Rainfall/Runoff Information, <br /> <br />Magnitude/Frequency, Design Rainfall, Small Urban Basins" (6). It is sunnnarized in <br /> <br /> <br />Tables 111-2 through 111-4. For all sub-basins east of the Hogback Ridge infil- <br /> <br /> <br />tration losses recommended by the Urban Storm Drainaqe criteria Manual were <br /> <br />~ Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers, Inc. <br />