Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />()- <br />\~./1 <br />O.t~~\C11 <br />\lI~\o" <br /> <br />B.6 <br /> <br />tet t = the straight length of the reach under consideration, <br />s <br /> <br />tm = the meander length of the channel in the reach, <br /> <br />Compute modifying value for meandering in accordB9ce with the following table <br /> <br />Ratio tm/ ts Degree of. Modifying <br />meande.rinp:: value <br /> <br />Minor <br />Appreciable <br />Severe <br /> <br />0.000 <br />0,15 ns <br />0.30 ns <br /> <br />1.0 to 1.2 <br />1.2 to 1.5 <br />1.5 and <br />greater <br /> <br />Where lengths for computing the appro~imate value of tm/ts are not readily <br />obtainable the degree of meandering can usually be judged reasonably well, <br /> <br />7th step, Computation of n for ~he reach. The value of n for the reach <br />is obtained by adding the values determined in Steps 1 through 6. An illus- <br />tration of the estimation of n is given in ExBlllple 1, <br /> <br />Dealing with cases where both channel and flood plain flow occurs. <br /> <br />f'\.",:,~ <br />Work with natural streams and flpod~s often requires consideration of <br />a wide range of discharges, At the higher stages both channel and overbank <br />or flood plain flow are involved. Us~ally the conditions are such that the <br />channel and flood plain will have dif1erent degrees of retardance and, there- <br />fore, different n values, In such cases the hydraulic computations will be <br />improved by dividing the cross sections into parts or subdivisions having <br />different n values. . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The reason for and effect of subdividing cross sections is to permit <br />the composite n for the reach to vary with stage above the bankfull stage, <br />This effect is illustrated by Example; 2. The usual practice is to divide <br />the cross section into two parts; one: subdivision being the channel portion <br />and the other the flood plain, More than two subdivisions may be made if <br />conditions indicate wide variations of n. However, in view of the practical <br />aspects of the problem, more than three subdivisions would not normally be <br />justified, <br /> <br />In estimating n for the channel SUbdivision, all of the factors dis- <br />cussed above and all of the procedural steps would be considered, Although <br />conditions might indicate some variation of n with stage in the channel, it <br />is recommended that an average value ~f n be selected for use in the hy- <br />draulic computations for all stages, <br /> <br />In the case of flood plain subdiYisions, the estimate of n would con- <br />sider all factors except meandering. . That is, the estimate would employ <br />all of the procedural steps except Step 6., Flood plain n values will <br />normally be somewhat greater than the, channel values,j[Agricultural flood <br />plai.n conditions are not likely to indicate an n less than 0,05 to 0,06, <br />Many cases will justify values in the! 0,07 to 0,09 range and cases calling <br />for values as high as 0.15 to 0,20 may be encOuntered, These higher values <br />apply primarily because of the relatively shallow depths of flow, The two <br /> <br />,. <br />